Skip to content

Conversation

@nargetdev
Copy link

for ./build/examples/z_pub and ./build/examples/z_sub the eclipse/zenoh:main docker image does not work... immediately fails as

./z_sub
Opening session...
Unable to open session!

use tagged image eclipse/zenoh:1.5.1 ... and life gets better

>> [Subscriber] Received ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 141] Pub from Pico!')
>> [Subscriber] Received ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 142] Pub from Pico!')
>> [Subscriber] Received ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 143] Pub from Pico!')

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Putting Data ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 124] Pub from Pico!')...
Putting Data ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 125] Pub from Pico!')...
Putting Data ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 126] Pub from Pico!')...
Putting Data ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 127] Pub from Pico!')...
Putting Data ('demo/example/zenoh-pico-pub': '[ 128] Pub from Pico!')...

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

PR missing one of the required labels: {'ci', 'internal', 'enhancement', 'documentation', 'new feature', 'dependencies', 'breaking-change', 'api-sync', 'bug'}

@gmartin82
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution, but the README is correct in that when working with a checkout of Zenoh Pico main, then eclipse/zenoh:main should be used.

When working with a tagged version of Zenoh Pico, we'd recommend using the corresponding version of the Zenoh router (which you have done in this case).

@nargetdev
Copy link
Author

Use main is not at all obvious.

As another note - although in the end it is not many steps to get zenoh-pico running in platformio (on my ESP32 devices) it took me many hours figure out - I think a few more "idiot proof" instruction sequences will help launch this project.

@nargetdev
Copy link
Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants