Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update elastic-agent and beats images #8480

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pkoutsovasilis
Copy link
Contributor

in 9.x ubi is the default for elastic-agent and beats and although -ubi suffixed images are still getting produced they are practically the same as the default ones.

Also for 9.0 and onwards elastic-agent image repo changes from beats/elastic-agent to elastic-agent/elastic-agent

Relates https://github.com/elastic/ingest-dev/issues/3987, #8479

@botelastic botelastic bot added the triage label Feb 21, 2025
MetricbeatImage,
HeartbeatImage,
AuditbeatImage,
PacketbeatImage:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this not affect all stack images? Are there ones that keep the -ubi suffix?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis Feb 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am 100% sure only for elastic-agent and beats 🙂 That said I can't find anything about Journalbeat neither in the code repo nor in the container repo

$ docker manifest inspect docker.elastic.co/beats/journalbeat:9.0.0-SNAPSHOT
no such manifest: docker.elastic.co/beats/journalbeat:9.0.0-SNAPSHOT

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Journalbeat was removed in 7.16 to my knowledge

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok that makes sense, then everything I am 100% sure that needs to change is in this PR 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants