Skip to content

[New Rule] Git Repository or File Download to Suspicious Directory #4663

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Aegrah
Copy link
Contributor

@Aegrah Aegrah commented Apr 25, 2025

Summary

This rule detects the use of git to clone a repository or download files from GitHub using wget or curl, followed by the creation of files in suspicious directories such as /tmp, /var/tmp, or /dev/shm. This behavior may indicate an attempt to download a payload, exploit, or tool.

Telemetry

In testing stack / Detonate only TPs. Sample downloading pwnkit example:
{18077D2E-9032-4273-8BB3-CC048AA46248}

Copy link
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Apr 25, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Git Repository or File Download to Suspicious Directory (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

sequence by process.entity_id, host.id with maxspan=10s
[process where host.os.type == "linux" and event.type == "start" and event.action == "exec" and (
(process.name == "git" and process.args == "clone") or
(process.name in ("wget", "curl") and process.command_line like~ "*github*")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of thoughts:

  • Should we add gitlab and bitbucket to this?
  • SSH, SFTP, or SCP for cloning or copying?
  • May be out of scope and better for a different rule but maybe, Python/Node/NPM, etc.? --> pip install git+https://github.com/... or npm install https://github.com/...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants