Skip to content

Conversation

@Wgil
Copy link
Contributor

@Wgil Wgil commented Jul 2, 2025

The reason for suggesting this change is to keep a 1:1 map between asset profile denom field and elys asset registry ibcDenom field as you can see in the examples below:

Elys asset profile:

 authority: elys10d07y265gmmuvt4z0w9aw880jnsr700j6z2zm3
  base_denom: uelys
  commit_enabled: true
  decimals: "6"
  denom: uelys
  display_name: ELYS
  withdraw_enabled: true

Kava profile:

  address: elys10d07y265gmmuvt4z0w9aw880jnsr700j6z2zm3
  authority: elys10d07y265gmmuvt4z0w9aw880jnsr700j6z2zm3
  base_denom: ukava
  commit_enabled: true
  decimals: "6"
  denom: ibc/147B3FF1D005512CCE4089559AF5D0C951F4211A031F15E782E505B85022DF89
  display_name: KAVA
  display_symbol: ukava
  external_symbol: ukava
  ibc_channel_id: channel-13
  ibc_counterparty_chain_id: kava_2222-10
  ibc_counterparty_channel_id: channel-156
  ibc_counterparty_denom: ukava
  network: kava_2222-10
  path: transfer/channel-13
  unit_denom: ukava
  withdraw_enabled: true

@Wgil Wgil requested a review from fenriz07 July 2, 2025 14:10
@Wgil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wgil commented Jul 2, 2025

We decided to handle this logic in consumers

@Wgil Wgil closed this Jul 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants