Skip to content

chore: add additional acceptable branches to autoppia repos#183

Merged
anderdc merged 3 commits intoentrius:testfrom
bittoby:chore/add-additional-acceptable-branches-to-sn36-repos
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

chore: add additional acceptable branches to autoppia repos#183
anderdc merged 3 commits intoentrius:testfrom
bittoby:chore/add-additional-acceptable-branches-to-sn36-repos

Conversation

@bittoby
Copy link
Contributor

@bittoby bittoby commented Feb 12, 2026

Summary

Added additional acceptable branches to SN36 repos.

Repos:

  • autoppia_webs_demo
  • autoppia_iwa

Branch Pattern

"feature/*"

Reason

The repos are related to web agents and owner wants to add more websites to make tasks difficult and to build general web agents across various kinds of websites. But one website takes long to develop and implement events and use_cases for task. So he wants to use additional branches for new website for each.

@anderdc
Copy link
Collaborator

anderdc commented Feb 12, 2026

can you give an example (e.g. link the PR) where they have used the branch/pattern you are adding

also update the branch to be caught up with test

@bittoby
Copy link
Contributor Author

bittoby commented Feb 12, 2026

can you give an example (e.g. link the PR) where they have used the branch/pattern you are adding

Here is PR link: autoppia/autoppia_webs_demo#69

There are bulk code because I implemented new website.
But base score is low because of code density.
It's kind of unfair to me but I am not sure this is also issue or intentional.
Thanks

@anderdc
Copy link
Collaborator

anderdc commented Feb 12, 2026

it's intentional, as you mentioned it's 'bulk code', so the density was of course low, but you should receive a fair contribution bonus, it helps balance small, sharp/targeted PRs and large bulky ones

@bittoby
Copy link
Contributor Author

bittoby commented Feb 12, 2026

@anderdc Would you merge this?

@anderdc anderdc merged commit ecc0381 into entrius:test Feb 12, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants