parse "true" and "false" for Int/UInt records#10
Merged
AndreFavotto merged 1 commit intoepics-modules:mainfrom Mar 23, 2026
Merged
parse "true" and "false" for Int/UInt records#10AndreFavotto merged 1 commit intoepics-modules:mainfrom
AndreFavotto merged 1 commit intoepics-modules:mainfrom
Conversation
This will reduce work on EPICS side to parse true/false text replies. No other falsy and truthy variants are handled. See also: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4627#section-2.1
AndreFavotto
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2026
Collaborator
AndreFavotto
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good addition, thanks!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted to have this feature added, to reduce extra step needed in database record to parse true/false.
This will reduce work on EPICS side to parse true/false text replies.
No other falsy and truthy variants are handled, because they are not specified in the informative JSON document.
See also: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4627#section-2.1