-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Add patching and updating procedure for host OS in SDDC #206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
| # Recommended host OS patching and updating procedure in SDDC setup | ||
|
|
||
| ## Background | ||
|
|
||
| In SDDC setup, you are looking for the best approach for patching and updating their RHEL host OS, while making sure that the database service is available. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Prerequisites | ||
|
|
||
| Exasol 8 runs in SDDC setup. | ||
|
|
||
| ## How to apply host OS patch/update in SDDC setup | ||
|
|
||
| ### Step 1 | ||
|
|
||
| Update each host system while it is active. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Step 2 | ||
|
|
||
| If the host systems needs to be restarted, stop the database first, restart all hosts, and then start the database again. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Additional Notes | ||
|
|
||
| You may think of patching the host OS on the inactive half of SDDC, anticipating that it should not impact the availability of the DB, then they would switch SDDC over, to patch the host OS on the remaining side of SDDC. But Exasol opposes this approach because of the following reason. | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "you" or "they"?
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It should be "you".
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry for confusion. |
||
|
|
||
| Updating the host systems on the inactive half of SDDC, then switch SDDC over to patch the host OS on the remaining side of SDDC should theoretically work. However, it carries a risk of data loss due to the role of the inactive half of the cluster as storage redundancy. | ||
|
|
||
| If a node is being updated or restarted and is unavailable at the same time the active node (which relies on it for redundancy) experiences a storage failure, data loss could occur. | ||
|
|
||
| While backups may allow for recovery, the resulting database downtime would likely be even longer. This is a risk which Exasol and you may not want to take. Therefore Exasol does not recommend to the procedure of patching inactive SDDC site first then switch over SDDC to patch the rest. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Additional References | ||
|
|
||
| [Synchronous dual data center](https://docs.exasol.com/db/latest/planning/business_continuity/sddc_details.htm) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"you" or "their"?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for confusion.
This sentence mentions both "you" and "their". To me it looks somewhat confusing.