-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
stub_template #369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
stub_template #369
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f482598
remove example.sh stub; add stub_template
guygastineau bfbdf13
renamed to exercise_stub
guygastineau 350a1a0
revised
guygastineau cf0f064
shortened version
guygastineau fe9ea02
used Bash the proper noun for the language not the executable
guygastineau 386b99a
removed link
guygastineau f554053
added quotes to raw
guygastineau 1574653
indent blcok in main
guygastineau File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
#!/usr/bin/env bash | ||
|
||
# This stub should help you get started: | ||
# - Bash is flexible. You may use functions or write a "raw" script. | ||
# | ||
# - Complex code can be made easier to read by breaking it up | ||
# into functions, however this is sometimes overkill in bash. | ||
# | ||
# - You can find links about good style and other resources | ||
# for Bash in './README.md'. It came with this exercise. | ||
# | ||
# Example: | ||
# # other functions here | ||
# # ... | ||
# # ... | ||
# | ||
# main () { | ||
# # your main function code here | ||
# } | ||
# | ||
# # call main with all of the positional arguments | ||
# main "$@" | ||
# | ||
# *** REMOVE THIS STUB BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR SOLUTION FOR MENTORING *** | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe move the general guidance into the bash template that shows up on the exercise description and make the stub a lot more ... stub-like? Short, sweet and simple without a repetitive wall of text that need to delete every exercise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can work on that.
With our current testing set up I don't want the student to feel pressured into using functions. That is why I commented the whole thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we move to a library testing model for our exercises, then all of these will change. Then our stubs will simply give the skeleton of the API that our lib needs, and these stubs will be irrelevant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, we would still need to use a message telling students to delete the stub comments no matter how short the stub is.
In the example you give above at least 2 in 10 people will leave the
# your code here
line in their file.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I want to be clear, @IsaacG, that your suggestion here is ideal. Once #366 is resolved the stubs won't be throw away anymore.
I am mostly trying to satisfy #365 in the meantime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I trimmed out some of the verbosity ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does 24 lines make you feel better about this than 32?