Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade axios from 1.3.4 to 1.8.2 #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

filipeoliveiraa
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • ui/package.json
  • ui/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-9292519
  703  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @filipeoliveiraa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses a security vulnerability by upgrading the axios dependency from version 1.3.4 to 1.8.2. This upgrade resolves a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-AXIOS-9292519) with a severity score of 703. The changes primarily involve updating the axios version and its transitive dependency follow-redirects in package.json and package-lock.json.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: The primary purpose of this PR is to upgrade the axios package to address a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
  • Dependency Update: The axios dependency is updated from version 1.3.4 to 1.8.2 in package.json and package-lock.json.
  • Transitive Dependency Update: The follow-redirects transitive dependency is updated as part of the axios upgrade.

Changelog

  • ui/package-lock.json
    • Updated axios version from 1.3.4 to 1.8.2 (line 17 -> 17).
    • Updated axios version from 1.3.4 to 1.8.2, including integrity hash and license (line 5294 -> 5294).
    • Updated follow-redirects version from 1.15.2 to 1.15.9, including integrity hash and license (line 8441 -> 8442).
  • ui/package.json
    • Updated axios version from 1.3.4 to 1.8.2 (line 12 -> 12).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A knight in shining code appears,
To banish bugs and quell our fears.
With updates swift, a version new,
Security's fortress, strong and true.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades the axios dependency to address a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The changes appear straightforward and involve updating the package.json and package-lock.json files. However, a closer look is needed to ensure no unintended consequences arise from this upgrade.

Summary of Findings

  • Dependency Upgrade: The pull request upgrades the axios dependency from version 1.3.4 to 1.8.2 to address a medium severity SSRF vulnerability. This is a positive step towards improving the application's security.
  • Potential Breaking Changes: While upgrading dependencies is necessary for security, it's crucial to verify that the new version doesn't introduce breaking changes that could affect the application's functionality. A review of the Axios changelog is recommended.

Merge Readiness

The pull request addresses a security vulnerability, which is crucial. However, due to the potential for breaking changes with dependency upgrades, I recommend that the author review the Axios changelog and verify that the application continues to function as expected. I am unable to approve this pull request, and other reviewers should verify the changes before merging.

Comment on lines 5293 to +5296
"node_modules/axios": {
"version": "1.3.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/axios/-/axios-1.3.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-toYm+Bsyl6VC5wSkfkbbNB6ROv7KY93PEBBL6xyDczaIHasAiv4wPqQ/c4RjoQzipxRD2W5g21cOqQulZ7rHwQ==",
"version": "1.8.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/axios/-/axios-1.8.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-ls4GYBm5aig9vWx8AWDSGLpnpDQRtWAfrjU+EuytuODrFBkqesN2RkOQCBzrA1RQNHw1SmRMSDDDSwzNAYQ6Rg==",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The axios version has been updated in package-lock.json. It's important to ensure that all transitive dependencies and integrations with axios are still compatible with this new version. Have you reviewed the Axios changelog for any breaking changes?

Comment on lines 8441 to +8444
"node_modules/follow-redirects": {
"version": "1.15.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/follow-redirects/-/follow-redirects-1.15.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-VQLG33o04KaQ8uYi2tVNbdrWp1QWxNNea+nmIB4EVM28v0hmP17z7aG1+wAkNzVq4KeXTq3221ye5qTJP91JwA==",
"version": "1.15.9",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/follow-redirects/-/follow-redirects-1.15.9.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-gew4GsXizNgdoRyqmyfMHyAmXsZDk6mHkSxZFCzW9gwlbtOW44CDtYavM+y+72qD/Vq2l550kMF52DT8fOLJqQ==",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The follow-redirects dependency has also been updated. Verify that this update doesn't introduce any compatibility issues or unexpected behavior related to redirect handling in the application.

Copy link

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected]1.8.2 Transitive: filesystem +5 2.26 MB emilyemorehouse, jasonsaayman, mzabriskie, ...1 more

View full report↗︎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants