Skip to content

Bump Jest dependencies - #2112

Open
julianna-ciq wants to merge 1 commit into
agent/add-depcheckfrom
agent/bump-jest-deps
Open

Bump Jest dependencies#2112
julianna-ciq wants to merge 1 commit into
agent/add-depcheckfrom
agent/bump-jest-deps

Conversation

@julianna-ciq

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • bump Jest from 29.7.0 to 30.4.2
  • bump @types/jest from 29.5.12 to 30.0.0
  • bump ts-jest from 29.1.2 to 29.4.12 for Jest 30 compatibility
  • retain jest-junit 17.0.0, which is already current
  • update the shared npm lockfile

Validation

  • npm test --workspace packages/fdc3-security (45 tests passed)
  • clean npm install from the updated lockfile
  • monorepo build validation; the only local interruption was npm's known omission of Rollup's Windows optional binary, after installing that platform binary the remaining CommonJS build passed

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.10%. Comparing base (d8d2805) to head (42d404e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           agent/add-depcheck    #2112   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               95.10%   95.10%           
===================================================
  Files                      73       73           
  Lines                    4190     4190           
  Branches                  667      589   -78     
===================================================
  Hits                     3985     3985           
  Misses                    205      205           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@julianna-ciq
julianna-ciq marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2026 18:16
@julianna-ciq
julianna-ciq requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2026 18:16

@kriswest kriswest left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kriswest

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs lockfile conflicts resolved @julianna-ciq

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants