Skip to content

Conversation

@zwgsyko
Copy link

@zwgsyko zwgsyko commented Dec 7, 2025

No description provided.

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Dec 7, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @zwgsyko, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the project's README.md by eliminating references to specific authentication methods that are no longer applicable or supported. The objective is to ensure the documentation remains accurate and relevant, providing a clearer guide for users by removing potentially confusing or deprecated options.

Highlights

  • Documentation Cleanup: Removed outdated or irrelevant Facebook authentication methods (Firebase popup and redirect) from the README.md file.
  • Authentication Method Pruning: Removed the entry for Multi-factor authentication with SMS (specific to Google Cloud Identity Platform) from the README.md.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the main README.md file by removing references to a few authentication samples. While the changes to the README.md file itself are minor, they introduce inconsistencies with other parts of the project. Specifically, the samples for Facebook popup/redirect authentication and Multi-Factor Authentication are removed from the main list, but the corresponding sample files and their mentions in auth/README.md are still present. This could lead to confusion for users trying to navigate the samples. My review includes suggestions to address these inconsistencies.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

README.md (16-17)

medium

These two list items for Facebook authentication via popup and redirect are being removed. However, the sample files (auth/facebook-popup.html, auth/facebook-redirect.html) and the references in auth/README.md (line 10) still exist. This could be confusing for users. If these samples are being deprecated, consider removing the corresponding files and updating auth/README.md as well. If not, these items should likely be kept in the list.

README.md (27)

medium

This list item for Multi-factor authentication is being removed. However, the sample for MFA (auth/mfa-password.html) and its documentation in auth/README.md (line 14) still exist. This creates an inconsistency. If the sample is still supported, it should be listed here. Note that the original item was also missing a link to the sample file, unlike other items in the list. If the sample is being removed, the corresponding files should also be deleted to avoid confusion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant