Skip to content

Conversation

@davidmfinol
Copy link
Member

@davidmfinol davidmfinol commented Nov 22, 2025

Changes

  • Clarified disk space issues when running multiple jobs sequentially in GitHub Actions workflows. Updated recommendations for using GitHub-hosted larger runners and self-hosted/cloud runners.

Checklist

  • Read the contribution guide and accept the
    code of conduct
  • Readme (updated or not needed)
  • Tests (added, updated or not needed)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced troubleshooting guidance for disk-space issues on GitHub Actions, clarifying limited disk on hosted runners and how sequential jobs can exhaust space
    • Added "GitHub-Hosted Larger Runners" as a remediation option with link
    • Expanded self-hosted and cloud runner guidance, including clearer examples and updated remediation steps (cloud runner example added)

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Set build step id to `buildStep` to help readers avoid confusion.
Clarified disk space issues when running multiple jobs sequentially in GitHub Actions workflows. Updated recommendations for using GitHub-hosted larger runners and self-hosted/cloud runners.
@github-actions
Copy link

Cat Gif

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation for troubleshooting GitHub Actions disk-space issues was expanded: added explicit rationale about limited GitHub-hosted runner disk space and large Unity images, described disk-space risks when jobs run sequentially, introduced a new “GitHub-Hosted Larger Runners” remediation, and expanded the self-hosted/cloud runners guidance with examples.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation expansion & reorganization
docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx
Expanded disk-space guidance with GitHub-hosted runner limits and Unity image size; added sequential-job disk-space risk examples; added “GitHub-Hosted Larger Runners” remediation step; renumbered and expanded “Use Self-Hosted or Cloud Runners” with cloud runner examples.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Single documentation file changed with straightforward content additions and reorganization
  • No code or configuration logic modified

Poem

🐇 I nibble bytes where runners sleep,

I tidy caches, make builds less steep.
New runner choices bloom and sing,
Disk-space troubles take to wing.
Hooray for clearer paths we bring! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change in the changeset: updating troubleshooting documentation for disk space issues.
Description check ✅ Passed The pull request description includes all required sections with appropriate detail: a clear Changes section describing the modifications and a completed Checklist confirming contribution guidelines compliance.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch davidmfinol-patch-4

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 030a146 and d3b2e64.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build_and_preview

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e49e41 and 030a146.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: 👩‍💻
docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx

[error] 1-1: Prettier formatting check failed for docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx. Run 'prettier --write' to fix code style issues.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build_and_preview
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/09-troubleshooting/common-issues.mdx (1)

282-292: Links verified and accessible.

Both external documentation references are accessible:

  • GitHub-Hosted Larger Runners documentation returns HTTP 200 (direct access)
  • game.ci Cloud Runners documentation returns HTTP 301 (permanent redirect, properly handled by browsers/clients)

The content is well-structured, actionable, and correctly references current external documentation. No issues identified.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 22, 2025

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit d3b2e64):

https://game-ci-5559f--pr524-davidmfinol-patch-4-9o1bv1mv.web.app

(expires Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:04:57 GMT)

🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎

Sign: 1f0574f15f83e11bfc148eae8646486a6d0e078b

@davidmfinol davidmfinol enabled auto-merge (squash) November 25, 2025 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants