Skip to content

Conversation

@patchwork01
Copy link
Collaborator

@patchwork01 patchwork01 commented Oct 24, 2025

Make sure you have checked all steps below.

Issue

Tests

  • My PR adds the following tests based on our test strategy OR does not need testing for this extremely good reason:
    • Just updated performance assertion

Documentation

  • In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it, or I have linked to a
    separate issue for that below.
  • If I have added new Java code, I have added Javadoc that explains it following our conventions and style.
  • If I have added or removed any dependencies from the project, I have updated the NOTICES file.

@patchwork01 patchwork01 added the needs-reviewer Pull requests that need a reviewer to be assigned label Oct 24, 2025
@rtjd6554 rtjd6554 removed the needs-reviewer Pull requests that need a reviewer to be assigned label Oct 27, 2025
@patchwork01 patchwork01 merged commit ad4db8a into develop Oct 27, 2025
3 checks passed
@patchwork01 patchwork01 deleted the 5910-datafusion-performance-assertion branch October 27, 2025 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CompactionDataFusionPerformanceST performance higher than asserted

4 participants