Skip to content

Conversation

@pvgenuchten
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

counter clockwise is expected

Related Issue / Discussion

#1107

Additional Information

Contributions and Licensing

(as per https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#contributions-and-licensing)

  • I'd like to contribute [feature X|bugfix Y|docs|something else] to pycsw. I confirm that my contributions to pycsw will be compatible with the pycsw license guidelines at the time of contribution.
  • I have already previously agreed to the pycsw Contributions and Licensing Guidelines

@pvgenuchten pvgenuchten requested a review from tomkralidis April 14, 2025 08:06
@pvgenuchten
Copy link
Contributor Author

superseded by #1109

@pvgenuchten
Copy link
Contributor Author

pvgenuchten commented Apr 17, 2025

actually #1109 does not solve #1107 (it only applies to explicit envelope bounds), so this PR is still relevant

@pvgenuchten pvgenuchten reopened this Apr 17, 2025
@pvgenuchten pvgenuchten force-pushed the counter-clockwise-polygons branch from 3fb0d0c to 71b041c Compare April 17, 2025 08:55
@github-actions
Copy link

This Pull Request has been inactive for 90 days. In order to manage maintenance burden, it will be automatically closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 21, 2025
@pvgenuchten pvgenuchten force-pushed the counter-clockwise-polygons branch from 71b041c to b806947 Compare September 28, 2025 08:56
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Oct 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant