Skip to content

docs/organization: Add new organization category #605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EbonJaeger
Copy link
Member

Description

This Pull Request adds a new section to document how Solus is organized. In it, we have pages for our Core Values, the teams that make up Solus, and how people can contribute to Solus.

Still need short blurbs from everyone about themselves.

Signed-off-by: Evan Maddock <[email protected]>
The addition of a fourth block makes everything awkward, but that'll be
a problem for another PR.

Signed-off-by: Evan Maddock <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Evan Maddock <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Evan Maddock <[email protected]>
@EbonJaeger EbonJaeger force-pushed the add-organizational-docs branch from 158ec15 to bf19a51 Compare February 26, 2025 20:12
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Staff group is missing

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Staff encompasses everyone, right? That seems a little redundant to include as a section. How about mentioning the group at the top of the teams page?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Staff group, at least in GitHub, represents only 13 people, that is distinct from Packagers. Staff has direct push access, and makes decisions for the project.
https://github.com/orgs/getsolus/teams/staff

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Under Review in Web and Documentation Apr 10, 2025
@EbonJaeger EbonJaeger requested a review from TraceyC77 April 11, 2025 18:28
This required a little tweaking to how people are defined, as the previous implementation only assumed a first and last name. It should be better after this commit.

Signed-off-by: Evan Maddock <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Under Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants