Skip to content

Sapphire announcement - #150

Merged
alexiscolin merged 8 commits into
gnolang:mainfrom
ryanlee19:sapphire-announcement
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

Sapphire announcement#150
alexiscolin merged 8 commits into
gnolang:mainfrom
ryanlee19:sapphire-announcement

Conversation

@ryanlee19

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sapphire blog announcement

@ryanlee19
ryanlee19 requested review from a team and moul as code owners August 11, 2026 01:05

@alexiscolin alexiscolin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fact-checked against the released genesis.json on chain/sapphire — all accurate:

  • chain_id = sapphire-1
  • 85 packages at genesis ✅
  • 2 founding validators ✅
  • 3 pre-funded faucet accounts ✅
  • "17 commits ahead of Topaz" — exactly 17 (git rev-list --count 959cefd91..1bf8b2826) ✅
  • all 26 links return 200; the Discord invite resolves to the Gno.land guild, #testnet-announcements
  • every referenced PR number matches its actual title ✅

Renders cleanly through gnoweb's markdown engine — one H1, no raw HTML, list structure correct.

One wording question, non-blocking:

- Protocol-level test transfers enabled

misc/deployments/sapphire.gno.land/README.md:12 and gen-genesis.sh (l. 14, 715-716) both describe this as "Transfers: unrestricted — no bank lock, no unrestricted-accounts list" — identical to Topaz, whose post phrased it "Unrestricted token transfers". The current wording reads as though a feature was switched on, rather than a restriction simply being absent. Worth aligning with the Topaz post?

@alexiscolin alexiscolin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Facts verified against the released genesis, renders cleanly. The wording nit above is non-blocking. Approving.

@alexiscolin
alexiscolin merged commit d22d9c4 into gnolang:main Aug 11, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants