Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move some functions from package git to gitrepo #33910

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Move some functions from package git to gitrepo #33910

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Mar 16, 2025

Follow #33874

@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Mar 16, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Mar 16, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 16, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Mar 16, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Mar 17, 2025
wxiaoguang
wxiaoguang previously requested changes Mar 17, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should stop here.

The design is wrong.

You can't make every function do "for repo" and "for wiki".

Since wiki is also a git repo, it should share the same repo interface as a code repo.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 17, 2025
@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2025
Merged
@lunny lunny closed this in #33924 Mar 19, 2025
@lunny lunny closed this in a9e8ac0 Mar 19, 2025
@lunny lunny reopened this Mar 19, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang dismissed their stale review March 27, 2025 07:34

dismiss

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged labels Mar 27, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 28, 2025
wxiaoguang
wxiaoguang reviewed Mar 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
services/repository/transfer.go Outdated
repo_model.StorageRepo(repo_model.RelativePath(repo.OwnerName, newRepoName))); err != nil {
repo_model.StorageRepo{
RelativePath: repo_model.RelativePath(repo.OwnerName, newRepoName),
ObjectFormatName: repo.ObjectFormatName,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You see, I have told you, it is not right.

I do not see why your design would work without buggy behaviors.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0d941b5 reverted the new interface.

wxiaoguang
wxiaoguang requested changes Mar 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The design of StorageRepo is buggy and will cause more abuses or bugs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged and removed lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. labels Mar 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang wxiaoguang requested changes

@techknowlogick techknowlogick techknowlogick approved these changes

@hiifong hiifong hiifong approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@lunny @techknowlogick @wxiaoguang @hiifong @GiteaBot