website/integrations: add tandoor

[chwshka]

Details

Adds documentation on integrating Tandoor recipe manager with authentik.

This would close #6609

---

Checklist

Inapplicable

- [ ] Local tests pass (`ak test authentik/`) - [ ] The code has been formatted (`make lint-fix`)

If an API change has been made

• The API schema has been updated (make gen-build)

If changes to the frontend have been made

• The code has been formatted (make web)

If applicable

• The documentation has been updated
• The documentation has been formatted (make website)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for authentik-storybook canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ff7472d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-storybook/deploys/67dbd9d757226f000811540e

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for authentik-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ff7472d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-docs/deploys/67dbd9d7eb3e2d00083d7b30
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-13560--authentik-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[dominic-r]

@chwshka Thank you for opening this PR, it is greatly appreciated. Here are a few suggestions to get your review going. Please do LMK if you have any questions concerning this review!

[chwshka]

@dominic-r I think I've matched the document with the new template. Let me know if you spot anything else.

[dominic-r]

Thanks. Here are a few more related to that new section. Otherwise, this looks pretty good!

[dominic-r]

@chwshka Hi, I notice the documentation build is failing. Before merging, these errors would need to be resolved. Can you take a look at this when you have a second? Thanks

[dominic-r]

By the looks of it, the error is in the provider configuration, KBD isn't meant for multi line code blocks, you should use ``` instead

[chwshka]

By the looks of it, the error is in the provider configuration, KBD isn't meant for multi line code blocks, you should use ``` instead

That's fixed. The codeblock is now using ```. The environment variables codeblock includes <em></em> sections. I assume this is ok?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.76%. Comparing base (ad27f26) to head (ff7472d).
Report is 71 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13560      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.73%   92.76%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         794      794              
  Lines       40425    40493      +68     
==========================================
+ Hits        37487    37562      +75     
+ Misses       2938     2931       -7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	47.96% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
integration	24.28% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unit	90.52% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[tanberry]

Hi @chwshka thanks for this PR. Thanks also for linking to PR# #6609. Was it not possible to add to that PR, and co-author it with the original contributor? Maybe not, perhaps the technical details had changed too much, but I wanted to ask. We can go ahead and merge yours, and if OK with you, in the closing comments I'd like to acknowledge the work the original contributor(s) did?

[chwshka]

Hi @chwshka thanks for this PR. Thanks also for linking to PR# #6609. Was it not possible to add to that PR, and co-author it with the original contributor? Maybe not, perhaps the technical details had changed too much, but I wanted to ask. We can go ahead and merge yours, and if OK with you, in the closing comments I'd like to acknowledge the work the original contributor(s) did?

That probably would have been better. I'll do that next time. I'd be happy to have the author of #6609 acknowledged.

[dominic-r]

LGTM! Thanks

[tanberry]

Thanks @chwshka for this contribution, and thanks also to @fyksen and several others for their work on the original #6609 PR. It's great to have Tandoor integration now documented!