Revert "🔥 feat: Add support for context.Context in keyauth middleware"

[sixcolors]

Reverts #3287

Reversion of Middleware Changes in Fiber v3

Following discussions in issue #3358, we have reverted changes that attempted to copy values into context.Context within various middlewares. These changes were removed to maintain Fiber’s lightweight design, improve performance, and avoid unnecessary complexity for users who do not require context.Context.

Why Were These Changes Reverted?

• Fiber prioritizes performance, and modifying context.Context for every request introduces unnecessary overhead.
• Values are already accessible via c.Locals(), making context modifications redundant.
• Users who need context.Context values can implement a trivial custom middleware without affecting default behavior.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request simplifies token extraction in the key authentication middleware by eliminating context handling via the standard library’s context.Context and focusing solely on the use of fiber.Ctx. The function now directly retrieves the token from fiber.Ctx’s locals, and test cases have been updated accordingly by removing nested tests and the invalid context type scenario.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
middleware/keyauth/keyauth.go	Removed the use of context.Context by deleting context.WithValue and related context setting. Updated TokenFromContext to accept only fiber.Ctx and streamlined token retrieval from locals.
middleware/keyauth/keyauth_test.go	Simplified tests by removing nested sub-tests for context.Context and invalid context type checks. Now only tests token extraction from fiber.Ctx using the Authorization header.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client Request
    participant FC as fiber.Ctx
    participant TK as TokenFromContext
    C->>FC: Send request with Authorization header
    FC->>TK: Invoke TokenFromContext(Fiber.Ctx)
    TK->>FC: Retrieve token from Locals
    TK-->>FC: Return token (or empty string)

Loading

Poem

I hopped through bits and bytes with care,
Removing contexts floating in the air.
With fiber as my trusty guide,
The token now in locals does reside.
A rabbit’s cheer in code so neat,
Hop along to make our middleware complete! 🐇

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Free

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bf2929 and 56c7372.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• middleware/keyauth/keyauth.go (1 hunks)
• middleware/keyauth/keyauth_test.go (1 hunks)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.72%. Comparing base (4bf2929) to head (56c7372).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3364      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.67%   83.72%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines       11721    11711      -10     
==========================================
- Hits         9807     9805       -2     
+ Misses       1486     1480       -6     
+ Partials      428      426       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	83.72% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.

Benchmark suite	Current: 811732c	Previous: 87f3f0c	Ratio
Benchmark_Compress_Levels/Brotli_LevelBestCompression - B/op	6 B/op	0 B/op	+∞

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.