Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vk: Use-after-free coverage #8273

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

poweifeng
Copy link
Contributor

To allow for use-after-free discovery with ref-counting, we keep a bit to indicate whether the handle is considered destroyed by Filament. We assert against "cast"-ing a destroyed handle.

@poweifeng poweifeng added the internal Issue/PR does not affect clients label Nov 14, 2024
Comment on lines +63 to +67
if (UTILS_UNLIKELY(ptr->isHandleConsideredDestroyed())) {
FILAMENT_CHECK_PRECONDITION(!ptr->isHandleConsideredDestroyed())
<< "Handle id=" << ptr->id << " (" << getTypeStr(ptr->restype)
<< ") is being used after it has been freed";
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you don't need the if here, FILAMENT_CHECK_PRECONDITION already does all the likely/unlikely shenanigans

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was trying to avoid hitting the switch in getTypeStr unless necessary, hence the roundabout logic here.
Do you think it's worth it or not? (or maybe it just going to be speculatively executed anyways?).

@@ -156,6 +162,7 @@ struct resource_ptr {
// only be used from VulkanDriver.
inline void dec() {
assert_invariant(mRef);
mRef->setHandleConsiderDestroyed();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we at least assert_invariant() here that the handle is not already in the considered destroyed state? (I think this should never happen right?).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

To allow for use-after-free discovery with ref-counting, we keep
a bit to indicate whether the handle is considered destroyed by
Filament. We assert against "cast"-ing a destroyed handle.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
internal Issue/PR does not affect clients
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants