Update quant.csv - #10937
Conversation
Forgot to fix the font name from "khyay" to "Khyay"
FontSpector reportfontspector version: 1.7.4 Check results[1] ofl/khyay/DESCRIPTION.en_us.html🔥 FAIL Does DESCRIPTION file contain a upstream Git repo URL? (googlefonts/description/git_url)
[8] ofl/khyay🔥 FAIL Checking OS/2 usWinAscent & usWinDescent (family/win_ascent_and_descent)
🔥 FAIL Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts (googlefonts/font_copyright)
"Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "copyright 2014 google inc. all rights reserved." [code: bad-notice-format] 🔥 FAIL Check copyright namerecords match license file. (googlefonts/name/license)
🔥 FAIL Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (googlefonts/glyph_coverage)
|
| Name | Current | Expected |
|---|---|---|
| Family Name | Myanmar Khyay | Myanmar Khyay |
| Subfamily Name | Regular | Regular |
| Full Name | Myanmar Khyay | Myanmar Khyay Regular |
| Postscript Name | MyanmarKhyay | MyanmarKhyay-Regular |
| Typographic Family Name | N/A | N/A |
| Typographic Subfamily Name | N/A | N/A |
⚠️ WARN Regular missing from full name [code: lacks-regular]
🔥 FAIL Checking OS/2 fsType does not impose restrictions. (googlefonts/fstype)
- 🔥 FAIL In this font fsType is set to 8 meaning that:
- The font may be embedded but must only be installed temporarily on other systems.
No such DRM restrictions can be enabled on the Google Fonts collection, so the fsType field must be set to zero (Installable Embedding) instead. [code: drm]
🔥 FAIL OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) is set in all fonts. (googlefonts/use_typo_metrics)
- 🔥 FAIL OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) was NOT set. [code: missing-os2-fsselection-bit7]
🔥 FAIL Check font follows the Google Fonts vertical metric schema (googlefonts/vertical_metrics)
-
🔥 FAIL OS/2.sTypoLineGap is 307; it should be 0 [code: bad-OS/2.sTypoLineGap]
-
🔥 FAIL hhea.lineGap is 67; it should be 0 [code: bad-hhea.lineGap]
⚠️ WARN Check that OS/2 fsSelection WWS bit is set correctly. (opentype/fsselection_wws)
⚠️ WARN OS/2 fsSelection WWS bit is not set, and the font does not have name IDs 21/22 (WWS Family/Subfamily). If the font's naming is WWS-conformant, the WWS bit should be set. [code: no-wws-without-wws-names]
⚠️ WARN Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class. (opentype/GDEF_mark_chars)
⚠️ WARN The following mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class:
- U+102D (u102D)
- U+102E (u102E)
- U+102F (u102F)
- U+1030 (u1030)
- U+1032 (u1032)
- U+1033 (u1033)
- U+1034 (u1034)
- U+1035 (u1035)
- U+1036 (u1036)
... and 18 others [code: mark-chars]
⚠️ WARN Check glyphs in mark glyph class are non-spacing. (opentype/GDEF_spacing_marks)
⚠️ WARN The following glyphs seem to be spacing (because they have width > 0 on the hmtx table) so they may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake, or they should have zero width instead:
- u1039_101D_103E [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN Checking OS/2 fsSelection value. (opentype/xavgcharwidth)
⚠️ WARN OS/2 xAvgCharWidth is 583 but it should be 504 which corresponds to the weighted average of the widths of the latin lowercase glyphs in the font. This may indicate a problem with the font editor or the font compiler. [code: xAvgCharWidth-wrong]
⚠️ WARN Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours. (contour_count)
-
⚠️ WARN This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are
inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a
large collection of reference font families. The divergences
listed below may simply indicate a significantly different
design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these
may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an
incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and
codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- gid503 (U+25CA): found 1, expected one of: [2] [code: contour-count]
⚠️ WARN Checking Vertical Metric linegaps. (linegaps)
-
⚠️ WARN hhea lineGap is not equal to 0. [code: hhea] -
⚠️ WARN OS/2 sTypoLineGap is not equal to 0. [code: OS/2]
⚠️ WARN Check math signs have the same width. (math_signs_width)
⚠️ WARN The most common width is 568 among a set of 13 math glyphs.
The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
width=635: gid500
width=592: gid276, gid278
width=624: gid277
width=828: gid354
width=615: gid501, gid502
width=565: gid396
width=692: gid499 [code: width-outliers]
⚠️ WARN Ensure indic fonts have the Indian Rupee Sign glyph. (rupee)
⚠️ WARN Font is missing the Indian Rupee Sign glyph. Please add a glyph for Indian Rupee Sign (₹) at codepoint U+20B9. [code: missing-rupee]
⚠️ WARN Checking that the typoAscender exceeds the yMax of the /Agrave. (typoascender_exceeds_Agrave)
⚠️ WARN OS/2.sTypoAscender value should be greater than 902, but got 750 instead [code: typoAscender]
⚠️ WARN Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (unreachable_glyphs)
⚠️ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- .null
- nonmarkingreturn [code: unreachable-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN Font has correct separator glyphs? (googlefonts/separator_glyphs)
-
⚠️ WARN Missing separator glyph U+2028 [code: missing-separator-glyphs] -
⚠️ WARN Missing separator glyph U+2029 [code: missing-separator-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN License URL matches License text on name table? (googlefonts/name/license_url)
⚠️ WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs in the license info URL [code: http-in-license-info]
⚠️ WARN Are there any misaligned on-curve points? (outline_alignment_miss)
-
⚠️ WARN x-height and cap-height checks are skipped because OS/2 table version is only 1 and version >= 2 is required for those checks. [code: skip-cap-x-height-alignment] -
⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
-
- u1009 (U+1009): X=150,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u100A (U+100A): X=150,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u100C (U+100C): X=570,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u100D (U+100D): X=150,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u1020 (U+1020): X=570,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u1025 (U+1025): X=150,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u1026 (U+1026): X=150,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u104C (U+104C): X=150,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
-
- u104E (U+104E): X=570,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
... and 27 others [code: found-misalignments]
- u104E (U+104E): X=570,Y=1 (should be at baseline 0?)
⚠️ WARN Do any segments have colinear vectors? (outline_colinear_vectors)
⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
- u1043 (U+1043): from (466.0, -340.0) to (325.0, -198.0) is colinear with segment from (325.0, -198.0) to (183.0, -57.0)
- u1043 (U+1043): from (325.0, -198.0) to (183.0, -57.0) is colinear with segment from (183.0, -57.0) to (115.0, 10.0)
- u1044 (U+1044): from (537.0, -57.0) to (395.0, -198.0) is colinear with segment from (395.0, -198.0) to (254.0, -340.0)
- u1044 (U+1044): from (605.0, 10.0) to (537.0, -57.0) is colinear with segment from (537.0, -57.0) to (395.0, -198.0)
- u100B_1039_100B: from (570.0, -380.0) to (570.0, -320.0) is colinear with segment from (570.0, -320.0) to (570.0, -86.0)
- u100B_1039_100B: from (570.0, -320.0) to (570.0, -86.0) is colinear with segment from (570.0, -86.0) to (570.0, -67.0)
- gid249 (U+0021): from (218.0, 716.0) to (218.0, 587.0) is colinear with segment from (218.0, 587.0) to (188.0, 226.0)
- gid249 (U+0021): from (108.0, 226.0) to (78.0, 587.0) is colinear with segment from (78.0, 587.0) to (78.0, 716.0)
- gid343 (U+00A1): from (77.0, -8.0) to (77.0, 118.0) is colinear with segment from (77.0, 118.0) to (107.0, 479.0)
... and 1 others [code: found-colinear-vectors]
⚠️ WARN Do outlines contain any semi-vertical or semi-horizontal lines? (outline_semi_vertical)
⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
- u1039_100C: Line(Line { p0: (-222.0, -370.0), p1: (-494.0, -368.0) }) (angle: 179.58 degrees, expected: 180.00 degrees)
- u100F_100D: Line(Line { p0: (815.0, -368.0), p1: (543.0, -370.0) }) (angle: -179.58 degrees, expected: -180.00 degrees)
- gid411 (U+00E6): Line(Line { p0: (514.0, 317.0), p1: (798.0, 316.0) }) (angle: -0.20 degrees, expected: 0.00 degrees)
- gid492 (U+2206): Line(Line { p0: (206.0, 111.0), p1: (584.0, 109.0) }) (angle: -0.30 degrees, expected: 0.00 degrees) [code: found-semi-vertical]
⚠️ WARN Are any segments inordinately short? (outline_short_segments)
⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have short segments:
- u1009 (U+1009) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (175.0, 0.0), p1: (162.0, 0.0), p2: (150.0, 1.0) }) (length: 25.03, total outline: 5803.35)
- u100A (U+100A) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (175.0, 0.0), p1: (162.0, 0.0), p2: (150.0, 1.0) }) (length: 25.03, total outline: 8662.80)
- u100C (U+100C) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (570.0, 1.0), p1: (558.0, 0.0), p2: (545.0, 0.0) }) (length: 25.03, total outline: 5631.74)
- u100D (U+100D) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (175.0, 0.0), p1: (162.0, 0.0), p2: (150.0, 1.0) }) (length: 25.03, total outline: 5273.21)
- u1020 (U+1020) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (570.0, 1.0), p1: (558.0, 0.0), p2: (545.0, 0.0) }) (length: 25.03, total outline: 6121.51)
- u1021 (U+1021) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (495.0, 130.0), p1: (515.0, 130.0), p2: (515.0, 137.0) }) (length: 22.94, total outline: 5899.63)
- u1021 (U+1021) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (515.0, 383.0), p1: (515.0, 390.0), p2: (495.0, 390.0) }) (length: 22.94, total outline: 5899.63)
- u1024 (U+1024) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (438.0, 130.0), p1: (495.0, 130.0) }) (length: 57.00, total outline: 9746.42)
- u1025 (U+1025) contains a short segment Quad(QuadBez { p0: (175.0, 0.0), p1: (162.0, 0.0), p2: (150.0, 1.0) }) (length: 25.03, total outline: 5631.74)
... and 64 others [code: found-short-segments]
⚠️ WARN Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table
set to optimize rendering? (googlefonts/gasp)
- ℹ️ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:
| PPM <= 8 | - Use grayscale rendering |
|---|---|
| PPM <= 16 | - Use grid-fitting |
| PPM <= 65535 | - Use grid-fitting |
| - Use grayscale rendering | |
| [code: ranges] |
-
⚠️ WARN The gasp table has a range of 8 that may be unnecessary [code: non-ffff-range] -
⚠️ WARN The gasp table has a range of 16 that may be unnecessary [code: non-ffff-range] -
⚠️ WARN The gasp range 0xFFFF value 0x03 should be set to 0x0F [code: unset-flags]
⚠️ WARN Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (googlefonts/meta/script_lang_tags)
⚠️ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
ℹ️ INFO Font contains all required tables? (required_tables)
-
ℹ️ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
loca
GPOS
GSUB
gasp [code: optional-tables]
ℹ️ INFO Font has old ttfautohint applied? (googlefonts/old_ttfautohint)
- ℹ️ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: Version 1.10 March 4, 2015, Version 1.10 March 4, 2015 [code: version-not-detected]
Summary
| 🔥 FAIL | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS | ⏩ SKIP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 26 | 5 | 88 | 83 |
| 11% | 11% | 2% | 39% | 37% |
Forgot to fix the font name from "khyay" to "Khyay"