Skip to content

Conversation

@bajajneha27
Copy link
Contributor

@bajajneha27 bajajneha27 commented Sep 29, 2025

This change is Reviewable

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.35036% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.09%. Comparing base (8c2b376) to head (14d53d1).
⚠️ Report is 60 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...le/cloud/storage/examples/storage_async_samples.cc 83.01% 9 Missing ⚠️
...le/cloud/storage/internal/async/connection_impl.cc 87.17% 5 Missing ⚠️
google/cloud/storage/testing/mock_resume_policy.h 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15573      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.10%   93.09%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2418     2418              
  Lines      222268   222232      -36     
==========================================
- Hits       206934   206897      -37     
- Misses      15334    15335       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bajajneha27 bajajneha27 marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2025 14:24
@bajajneha27 bajajneha27 requested review from a team as code owners October 1, 2025 14:24
shubham-up-47
shubham-up-47 previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2025
return connection_
->Open({std::move(spec),
internal::MergeOptions(std::move(opts), connection_->options())})
->Open({std::move(spec), google::cloud::internal::MergeOptions(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we writing full namespace now?

Copy link
Contributor

@shubham-up-47 shubham-up-47 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please search experimental and gcs_ex keywords in your local repo, so that we don't miss these words in any file.

Please fix the code coverage which are affected by these changes.

@bajajneha27 bajajneha27 added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Oct 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants