Skip to content

Conversation

@anamanolache
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@anamanolache anamanolache requested a review from kemp-google June 4, 2019 17:41
@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and have the pull request author add another comment and the bot will run again. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@anamanolache
Copy link
Contributor Author

still brushing up, please hold

@anamanolache
Copy link
Contributor Author

I finished testing all the cases, please review.
Travis fails because it doesn't have the api changes (the PubSubTopic field).

abort := make(chan os.Signal, 1)
signal.Notify(abort, os.Interrupt)

topic, err := newPubSubTopic(ctx, req.Pipeline.Resources.ProjectId)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we want to build topics in the tooling - gcloud can be used for that - I think we just want to support an optional flag.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is one feature that should be enabled by default. I changed the functionality to always use projects//topics/pipelines-tool if only it has the lable created-by:pipelines-tool. If the tool has any problem in using Pub/Sub it will silently switch to long pooling. Also the user can specify --pub-sub=false to opt for long pooling.

if len(names) < 1 {
return errors.New("missing operation name")
}
if *topic == "" {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We will still want to support polling and I think this doesn't need to be passed: when the operation data is fetched initially if there is a topic we'll start listening instead of polling.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants