Skip to content

PR: Added Interface term to single stage finitebeta#355

Draft
rogeriojorge wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
rj/interface_term_singlestage_finitebeta
Draft

PR: Added Interface term to single stage finitebeta#355
rogeriojorge wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
rj/interface_term_singlestage_finitebeta

Conversation

@rogeriojorge
Copy link
Contributor

The single stage optimization, up to now, has minimized the squared flux corrected for the target magnetic field.
According to texts on free boundary [add reference], an extra term is needed that minimizes the squared of the magnetic field just outside the plasma boundary and the square of magnetic field just inside the boundary.
Added that term here to the optimization.

@rogeriojorge
Copy link
Contributor Author

@f0uriest Could you help with the reference here so that we can compare the terms added here with the ones in the literature?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8e65c49) 91.15% compared to head (ecc91d0) 90.78%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #355      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.15%   90.78%   -0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines       12384    12386       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        11289    11245      -44     
- Misses       1095     1141      +46     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.78% <100.00%> (-0.37%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
src/simsopt/mhd/virtual_casing.py 98.92% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@f0uriest
Copy link

I haven't seen any particularly clear explanation in the literature, the least bad is probably Hirshman's 1986 paper on free boundary VMEC (doi:10.1016/0010-4655(86)90058-5).

That was using NESTOR to compute the total B outside the plasma due to the coils + plasma field. The equations implemented here are similar but using the virtual casing code to get B_plasma.

One possible extra complication is the presence of a sheet current on the plasma boundary. This is needed when pressure at the edge is nonzero, but is also in general allowed even when edge pressure is zero (at least I haven't been able to prove it's not there). Physically this is just because the plasma itself is a conductor immersed in a magnetic field, so you can get a sheet current that causes a jump in the tangential component of B. In practice it seems like this is usually negligible (for all of the equilibria I've tested in free boundary DESC the field due to the sheet current ends up being < 1e-8x smaller than the field from other sources)

@mishapadidar
Copy link
Contributor

@rogeriojorge is this PR still in progress or should we close?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants