Skip to content
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
82 changes: 82 additions & 0 deletions src/test-suite/tests/contains.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -96,6 +96,88 @@
},
"instance": ["foo", 42],
"errors": []
},
{
"description": "contains fails due to too many matching items with success explanations",
"compatibility": "2019",
"schema": {
"contains": { "type": "string" },
"maxContains": 1
},
"instance": [42, "foo", "bar"],
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "contains-exact-message",
"messageParams": {
"minContains": 1,
"maxContains": 1
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/contains", "#/maxContains"],
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "type-success",
"messageParams": {
"actualType": "string"
},
"instanceLocation": "#/1",
"schemaLocations": ["#/contains/type"]
}
],
[
{
"messageId": "type-success",
"messageParams": {
"actualType": "string"
},
"instanceLocation": "#/2",
"schemaLocations": ["#/contains/type"]
}
]
]
},
{
"description": "contains fails with multiple object matches",
"compatibility": "2019",
"schema": {
"contains": {
"required": ["a"]
},
"maxContains": 1
},
"instance": [{ "a": 1 }, { "a": 2 }],
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "contains-exact-message",
"messageParams": {
"minContains": 1,
"maxContains": 1
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/contains", "#/maxContains"],
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "a" },
"instanceLocation": "#/0",
"schemaLocations": ["#/contains/required"]
}
],
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "a" },
"instanceLocation": "#/1",
"schemaLocations": ["#/contains/required"]
}
]
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
89 changes: 89 additions & 0 deletions src/test-suite/tests/not.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,6 +24,95 @@
},
"instance": "foo",
"errors": []
},
{
"description": "not fails with success explanation",
"schema": {
"not": { "pattern": "^a" }
},
"instance": "apple",
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "not-message",
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not"],
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "pattern-success",
"messageParams": {
"pattern": "^a"
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not/pattern"]
}
]
]
}
]
},
{
"description": "not fails due to subschema match with success explanation",
"schema": {
"not": {
"required": ["a"]
}
},
"instance": { "a": 1 },
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "not-message",
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not"],
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "a" },
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not/required"]
}
]
]
}
]
},
Comment on lines +54 to +79
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see no difference between this test and the one before it. The not schemas are different, but there's nothing fundamentally different about what it's testing.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry for late reply I was travelling, yes this one and the previous one is fundamentally same except the not schema used here is required.

{
"description": "not with nested schema producing a match",
"schema": {
"not": {
"oneOf":[
{ "required": ["a"] },
{ "required": ["b"] }
]
}
},
"instance": { "a": 1, "b": 2 },
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "not-message",
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not"],
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "a" },
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not/oneOf/0/required"]
}
],
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "b" },
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/not/oneOf/1/required"]
}
]
]
}
]
}
Comment on lines +80 to 116
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one's not quite correct. The oneOf will fail in this example, which means not will pass and there should be no errors. You'd have to remove either "a" or "b" from the instance to get a failure.

My first thought was that I expected there to be a oneOf node in the output. But, then I realized that might not make sense in this case. Let's explore this case a bit more. Try writing out the error message and let's see if we can come up with something that's helpful and computable.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I got it. I should change the instance to { "a": 1 } which makes oneOf pass and not fail but I think the oneOf node in the output will be too abstract. not does not care about oneOf internal logic. It only cares that the subschema matched. Error message can be something like "The value matches a schema that it should not".

"errors": [
    {
      "messageId": "not-message",
      "instanceLocation": "#",
      "schemaLocations": ["#/not"],
      "alternatives": [
        [
          {
            "messageId": "required-success",
            "messageParams": { "property": "a" },
            "instanceLocation": "#",
            "schemaLocations": ["#/not/oneOf/0/required"]
          }
        ]
      ]
    }
  ]

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think I agree. If oneOf passes, it means one of the schemas passed and it's effectively a simple applicator in that case.

Error message can be something like "The value matches a schema that it should not".

We can't say "matches a schema". That's the kind of thing we're trying to avoid with this project. The reader shouldn't have to know anything about schemas to understand what's wrong with the data.

We can probably come up with a message for not that works ok, but I wonder if it would be better to provide a negated message for each keyword. For example, not-required would be something like The '{property}' property should not be present. It would probably make for a better experience, but it makes the handling even more complicated and we still don't really have a great solution for success messaging. Adding negation messaging might not be that simple.

]
}
131 changes: 119 additions & 12 deletions src/test-suite/tests/oneOf.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,10 +6,7 @@
{
"description": "oneOf",
"schema": {
"oneOf": [
{ "type": "string" },
{ "type": "number" }
]
"oneOf": [{ "type": "string" }, { "type": "number" }]
},
"instance": null,
"errors": [
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -46,10 +43,7 @@
{
"description": "oneOf more than one match",
"schema": {
"oneOf": [
{ "type": "integer" },
{ "type": "number" }
]
"oneOf": [{ "type": "integer" }, { "type": "number" }]
},
"instance": 1,
"errors": [
Expand All @@ -66,13 +60,126 @@
{
"description": "oneOf pass",
"schema": {
"oneOf": [
{ "type": "string" },
{ "type": "number" }
]
"oneOf": [{ "type": "string" }, { "type": "number" }]
},
"instance": 42,
"errors": []
},
{
"description": "oneOf more than one match with success explanations",
"schema": {
"oneOf": [{ "type": "integer" }, { "type": "number" }]
},
"instance": 66,
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "oneOf-message",
"messageParams": { "matchCount": 2 },
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "type-success",
"messageParams": {
"actualType": "integer"
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/0/type"]
}
],
[
{
"messageId": "type-success",
"messageParams": {
"actualType": "number"
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/1/type"]
}
]
],
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf"]
}
]
},
{
"description": "oneOf more than one match with failed alternatives ignored",
"schema": {
"oneOf": [
{ "required": ["a"] },
{ "required": ["b"] },
{ "required": ["c"] }
]
},
"instance": { "a": 1, "b": 2 },
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "oneOf-message",
"messageParams": { "matchCount": 2 },
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": {
"property": "a"
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/0/required"]
}
],
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": {
"property": "b"
},
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/1/required"]
}
]
],
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf"]
}
]
},
{
"description": "nested oneOf producing multiple matches in inner oneOf",
"schema": {
"oneOf": [
{
"oneOf": [{ "required": ["a"] }, { "required": ["b"] }]
},
{ "required": ["c"] }
]
},
"instance": { "a": 1, "b": 2 },
"errors": [
{
"messageId": "oneOf-message",
"messageParams": { "matchCount": 2 },
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/0/oneOf"],
"alternatives": [
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "a" },
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/0/oneOf/0/required"]
}
],
[
{
"messageId": "required-success",
"messageParams": { "property": "b" },
"instanceLocation": "#",
"schemaLocations": ["#/oneOf/0/oneOf/1/required"]
}
]
]
}
]
}
]
}
Loading