Skip to content

[SYCL][E2E] Re-enable HIP tests disabled by flaky CI tracker #17464#22724

Open
zjin-lcf wants to merge 1 commit into
intel:syclfrom
zjin-lcf:reenable-hip-tests-17464
Open

[SYCL][E2E] Re-enable HIP tests disabled by flaky CI tracker #17464#22724
zjin-lcf wants to merge 1 commit into
intel:syclfrom
zjin-lcf:reenable-hip-tests-17464

Conversation

@zjin-lcf

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This re-enables three E2E tests that were marked UNSUPPORTED: hip as part of the flaky AMD/HIP CI cluster tracked in #17464. Those failures were not defects in the tests themselves — they were the parallel-execution memory faults/hangs on the AMD runner (worked around with -j1). The tests run and pass on an AMD Instinct MI210 (gfx90a):

Verification

Built with a recent DPC++ (-fsycl -fsycl-targets=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa, --offload-arch=gfx90a) and executed on an MI210 with ROCm 7.1.1; all three pass. Separately, the heavy-concurrency memory-fault signature from #17464 no longer reproduces on ROCm 7.1.1 (hundreds of concurrent runs, 0 faults/hangs), consistent with the underlying ROCm/driver bug having been resolved in newer ROCm.

Note: WorkGroupMemory/basic_usage.cpp (#17339) is intentionally left disabled — it currently triggers a separate device-compiler backend crash on gfx90a, unrelated to the #17464 concurrency issue.

CI

Please run the HIP/AMD pre-commit to confirm these pass on the CI runners' ROCm version before merging.



Removes UNSUPPORTED: hip from three tests that were disabled due to the
flaky AMD/HIP CI failures tracked in intel#17464 (memory faults/hangs under
parallel test execution, worked around with -j1). These tests were not
themselves broken on HIP; they pass on an AMD Instinct MI210 (gfx90a).

  - WeakObject/weak_object_expired.cpp (intel#17415)
  - HostInteropTask/host-task-dependency3.cpp (intel#17235)
  - Adapters/retain_events.cpp (intel#17236)
@zjin-lcf
zjin-lcf requested review from a team as code owners July 22, 2026 15:36
@zjin-lcf
zjin-lcf requested a review from uditagarwal97 July 22, 2026 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant