-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
🚧 Provide a Resource API Helper and example for testing Application Insights #61
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
/// <summary> | ||
/// Authentication representation to authenticate with resources running on Azure. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
public class ResourceApiAuthentication |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't we refactor our existing authentication and use that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes the token output of the Logic Apps is the same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that is correct, but I think we should be able to re-use the authentication since it's the same, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes a refactor of the Authenticator to give it generic naming and decouple from being Logic App specific would allow this PR to be re-factored and retested. Will proceed on that basis.
I was under the impression #60 is about Application Insights but it's mainly talking about Resource API. What should I understand with that? What does it represent? Is this the foundation for Application Insights features? If so, maybe better to add those in the same PR? |
Oh and thanks for the PR! |
Any update on this? |
I'll check on the naming refactor away from core components being named for Logic Apps (as per 15 Sep) , and if this is completed, I'll re-align this code. |
Relates to #60