Pass Request from JSONWebTokenSerializer to django.contrib.auth

[jksimoniii]

Closes #387

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #412 into master will decrease coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 92.85%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #412      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.67%   90.41%   -0.27%     
==========================================
  Files          14       12       -2     
  Lines         847      824      -23     
  Branches       29       29              
==========================================
- Hits          768      745      -23     
  Misses         66       66              
  Partials       13       13

Flag	Coverage Δ
#codecov	90.41% <92.85%> (-0.27%)	⬇️
#dj110	87.13% <85.71%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
#dj111	87.13% <85.71%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
#dj18	89.56% <85.71%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
#dj19	89.56% <85.71%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
#drf31	89.56% <85.71%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
#drf32	89.56% <85.71%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
#drf33	89.56% <85.71%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
#drf34	90.41% <92.85%> (-0.27%)	⬇️
#drf35	90.04% <92.85%> (-0.28%)	⬇️
#drf36	90.04% <92.85%> (-0.28%)	⬇️
#py27	90.41% <92.85%> (-0.27%)	⬇️
#py33	89.19% <85.71%> (-0.3%)	⬇️
#py34	90.04% <92.85%> (+0.55%)	⬆️
#py35	87.13% <85.71%> (?)
#py36	87.13% <85.71%> (?)

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
rest_framework_jwt/serializers.py	82.41% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
tests/test_serializers.py	95.71% <92.3%> (+0.4%)	⬆️
rest_framework_jwt/models.py
rest_framework_jwt/utils.py

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0a0bd40...a950756. Read the comment docs.

[Moulde]

Any updates on this?

[rubgombar1]

+1

[mscansian]

+1

[JamesonNetworks]

+1

[mscansian]

@jpadilla is it possible to merge this PR into master?

[paymog]

@jpadilla ping again, it's been almost 2 years since this was proposed. Is there anything I can do to speed things up?

EDIT: I just found #484. Guess this will never be merged.

[paymog]

Is the , at the end of this line a mistake? That creates a tuple for the value of serializer.context['request'] which doesn't seem quite right