-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gregsdennis/markdown lint #1549
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
What's checking these files? The automation that was added recently only checks the spec files. We can check markdown files intended for GitHub (like README.md) as well, but we probably don't want to use the same process because the build we have is highly customized for spec development and a lot of that doesn't apply to things like the README. Also, I'm not sure where the PROCESS.md falls. Should it be designed for GitHub or specs? I noticed you added header ids ( |
When I run lint, it's checking every markdown file. It's generating warnings, not errors; nothing's failing. It's not a big deal. The headers was from those warnings. If we're not concerned about the GitHub markdown files, I can figure out how to ignore them locally, and we can just close this PR. |
What do you mean by "run lint"? We have
Ok, but the real question is whether we want the process doc to be a spec file or GitHub file. I think it could go either way depending on what we want to do with that document. If it's a spec file, adding the heading id is necessary. If it's a GitHub file, that's not the right fix (assuming it needs to be fixed at all). If we want it to be treated like a spec file, it should be added to
I wouldn't close it. I think it's still a good cleanup. |
I'm manually running I really have no preference on whether it checks those files or not, but it's checking them when I run it. I think it could be nice eventually to have maybe the process file up on the website, but if we do that I expect we'd want to handle that case specifically and leave the others alone. |
|
Hm. Maybe I'm seeing the linting output from the build command, then. EDIT: Confirmed that I was doing it wrong. Still, these changes are nice to have, even if they're not being published. |
I'd like to wait until #1554 is merged before moving forward with this. Then we can include a |
a7c37ec
to
4ae845d
Compare
I added linting config for automation. The new build picks up more things than it did before, so there are a few more markdown linting issues to fix. Edit: Actually it looks like it's just linting more files. |
f20649a
to
b57419f
Compare
b57419f
to
668be4b
Compare
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
markdown foramtting update
Issue & Discussion References
n/a
Summary
Just applies linting to the repo markdown files. Not strictly necessary, but the lint is still checking these files, so we might as well.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?