feat: personal info component #61
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
packages/components/info/info.types.ts (1)
1-4: Consider enhancing type flexibility.The current type definition, whilst functional, could benefit from additional flexibility to support future requirements.
Consider this enhanced type structure:
export type InfoProps = { title: string; content: string; + className?: string; + titleClassName?: string; + contentClassName?: string; + onClick?: (title: string) => void; }[];packages/components/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
6-15: Consider cleaning up or implementing commented code.The commented-out glob import code suggests a potential future enhancement. Consider either implementing this feature or removing the comments to maintain cleaner code.
packages/components/list/list.tsx (1)
17-17: Consider using index-based or data-based keys.Using
crypto.randomUUID()for list keys is unnecessarily expensive. Since the keys only need to be unique within the list's scope, consider:
- Using the index if the list is static
- Using a unique identifier from your data if available
- <li key={crypto.randomUUID()}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li> + <li key={index}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li>packages/components/info/info.tsx (1)
10-11: Consider using stable keys for list items.Similar to the List component, using
crypto.randomUUID()is unnecessary here. Since the items are likely unique based on their title, use that instead.- key={crypto.randomUUID()} + key={item.title}docs/components/info.mdx (1)
1-4: Add security considerations section to documentation.Please add a section about security considerations when handling personal information, including:
- When to use data masking
- Best practices for PII handling
- Compliance requirements (GDPR, etc.)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
docs/components/_meta.json(1 hunks)docs/components/_meta.json(1 hunks)docs/components/info.mdx(1 hunks)packages/components/image/Image.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/info/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/info/info.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/info/info.types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/list/list.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/components/package.json
- packages/components/info/index.ts
- docs/components/_meta.json
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/components/_meta.json (2)
1-1: LGTM! Component metadata updated correctly.The addition of "info" to the component list is properly formatted and follows the existing pattern.
1-1: LGTM! Verify the Info component implementation.The addition of "info" to the components list is consistent with the PR's objective of introducing a new Info component.
Let's verify that the Info component exists and is properly implemented:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM – The Info component exists and is correctly implemented.
The verification shows that the component files (packages/components/info/info.tsxandpackages/components/info/info.types.ts) and the accompanying documentation (docs/components/info.mdx) are present in their expected locations. This confirms that the"info"entry indocs/components/_meta.jsonis valid.
- Component implementation verified in
packages/components/info/- Documentation verified in
docs/components/info.mdx🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of the Info component # Check if the component file exists in the expected location fd -t f "info" packages/components/ # Check if the documentation file exists fd -t f "info.mdx" docs/components/Length of output: 169
packages/components/image/Image.tsx (1)
6-6: Verify impact of onClick removal.The removal of the onClick handler is a breaking change that could affect existing implementations. Please ensure this change is intentional and documented.
Run this script to check for existing onClick usage:
✅ Verification successful
Image Component onClick Verification: No Impact Found
Our search did not reveal any usage of the onClick prop on the Image component within the codebase. Based on the current evidence, the removal of onClick from the props destructuring in Image.tsx does not appear to introduce a breaking change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Image component usage with onClick prop rg -l 'Image.*onClick' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run the search for Image component usage with the onClick prop in TSX files by # explicitly adding support for .tsx files. rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' -l '<Image[^>]*onClick=' .Length of output: 54
packages/components/index.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM! Export added correctly.The new Info component export follows the established pattern.
packages/components/list/list.tsx (1)
15-19: Improved semantic HTML structure.The change from
divto proper list elements (ulandli) enhances accessibility. Well done!
| import type { InfoProps } from './info.types'; | ||
|
|
||
| const Info = memo( | ||
| forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, { infoList: InfoProps }>(({ infoList }, ref) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add data protection mechanisms for PII handling.
The component handles personal information (PII) without any data protection mechanisms. Consider:
- Adding content masking options for sensitive data (e.g., phone numbers, email)
- Implementing data sanitisation
- Adding prop types for sensitivity levels
Here's a suggested implementation:
type Sensitivity = 'public' | 'masked' | 'sensitive';
interface InfoItem {
title: string;
content: string;
sensitivity?: Sensitivity;
}
interface InfoProps {
infoList: InfoItem[];
defaultSensitivity?: Sensitivity;
}
const maskContent = (content: string, sensitivity: Sensitivity) => {
if (sensitivity === 'public') return content;
if (sensitivity === 'masked') {
// Implement appropriate masking logic for different data types
return content.replace(/\w/g, '*');
}
return '******';
};| const infoList = [ | ||
| { title: "姓名", content: "张三" }, | ||
| { title: "年龄", content: "25" }, | ||
| { title: "学历", content: "硕士研究生" }, | ||
| { title: "联系方式", content: "13800138000" }, | ||
| { title: "邮箱", content: "[email protected]" }, | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace sensitive information in examples with dummy data.
The example contains what appears to be real personal information. Please:
- Use obviously fake data (e.g., "[email protected]", "01234567890")
- Add a note about PII handling best practices
- Demonstrate proper usage of data protection features
Example improvement:
const infoList = [
- { title: "姓名", content: "张三" },
- { title: "年龄", content: "25" },
- { title: "学历", content: "硕士研究生" },
- { title: "联系方式", content: "13800138000" },
- { title: "邮箱", content: "[email protected]" },
+ { title: "Name", content: "John Doe" },
+ { title: "Age", content: "30" },
+ { title: "Education", content: "Bachelor's Degree" },
+ { title: "Phone", content: "01234567890", sensitivity: "masked" },
+ { title: "Email", content: "[email protected]", sensitivity: "masked" },
]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const infoList = [ | |
| { title: "姓名", content: "张三" }, | |
| { title: "年龄", content: "25" }, | |
| { title: "学历", content: "硕士研究生" }, | |
| { title: "联系方式", content: "13800138000" }, | |
| { title: "邮箱", content: "zhangsan@example.com" }, | |
| ] | |
| const infoList = [ | |
| { title: "Name", content: "John Doe" }, | |
| { title: "Age", content: "30" }, | |
| { title: "Education", content: "Bachelor's Degree" }, | |
| { title: "Phone", content: "01234567890", sensitivity: "masked" }, | |
| { title: "Email", content: "john.doe@example.com", sensitivity: "masked" }, | |
| ] |
|
I'm sure that you should take a look at the core types, the values to be displayed should be extracted from If you are sure that some necessary value is missing in |
|
看一下兔子的建议捏 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Infocomponent for displaying personal informationInfocomponentImprovements
Listcomponent with more semantic HTML structureImagecomponent by removing click event handlerDocumentation
info.mdxfile_meta.jsonTechnical Updates
Infocomponent in package index