-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
⚠️ Promote v1beta2 conditions #12066
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚠️ Promote v1beta2 conditions #12066
Conversation
/test ? |
@fabriziopandini: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Next round. Still have a lot of things to check
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
@@ -101,53 +101,86 @@ func (c *ControlPlaneContract) StatusReplicas() *Int64 { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// UpdatedReplicas provide access to the status.updatedReplicas field in a ControlPlane object, if any. Applies to implementations using replicas. | |||
func (c *ControlPlaneContract) UpdatedReplicas() *Int64 { | |||
// TODO (v1beta2): Rename to V1Beta1DeprecatedUpdatedReplicas and make sure we are only using this method for compatibility with old contracts. | |||
func (c *ControlPlaneContract) UpdatedReplicas(contractVersion string) *Int64 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I understand how this fixes the test. Wasn't KCP still declaring the v1beta1 contract?
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
lgtm pending green e2e tests |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
@fabriziopandini: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main |
/lgtm /hold |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 88758bbdb8fb97a7f53c072417610d5b51129cf3
|
/assign @chrischdi |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi, sbueringer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR Promote v1beta2 conditions top level and move old conditions under status.deprecated.v1beta1
(same for the other fields introduced by the proposal for improving status)
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Rif #11947
/area api