Skip to content

Conversation

@CatherineF-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@CatherineF-dev CatherineF-dev commented May 7, 2025

See diagram at https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/metrics-server/blob/d8993efbc4c82ba49335c4a513575cdc0f8a8fea/README.md

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label May 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If metrics-server contributors determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 7, 2025
@CatherineF-dev CatherineF-dev changed the title Add a diagram shows how metrics-server handles a list pod request Add a diagram shows how metrics-server handles kubectl top pod request May 7, 2025
@slashpai
Copy link
Member

slashpai commented May 8, 2025

This is very nice :)

@slashpai
Copy link
Member

slashpai commented May 8, 2025

https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_metrics-server/1654/pull-metrics-server-verify/1920253007463714816 is been stuck something to do after golang ci update probably I will take a look but for now closing and reopening the PR will help

@slashpai
Copy link
Member

slashpai commented May 8, 2025

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@slashpai: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@slashpai
Copy link
Member

slashpai commented May 8, 2025

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this May 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@slashpai: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@CatherineF-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label May 8, 2025
@serathius
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@rexagod
Copy link
Member

rexagod commented May 19, 2025

/assign @serathius

@richabanker
Copy link

@CatherineF-dev do you want to address the open comments here? Seems to be a nice documentation change to have in.

@richabanker
Copy link

ping @CatherineF-dev

@rexagod rexagod moved this to Needs Triage in SIG Instrumentation Aug 30, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 22, 2025
@CatherineF-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serathius needs a review again.

@CatherineF-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serathius, would you mind reviewing again when available?

@serathius
Copy link
Contributor

Can you squash the commits?

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CatherineF-dev, serathius

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Status: Needs Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants