Skip to content

WIP: Proove 1956 #3479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

WIP: Proove 1956 #3479

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

tiraboschi
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
Proove openshift/library-go#1956

Reviewer Checklist

Reviewers are supposed to review the PR for every aspect below one by one. To check an item means the PR is either "OK" or "Not Applicable" in terms of that item. All items are supposed to be checked before merging a PR.

  • PR Message
  • Commit Messages
  • How to test
  • Unit Tests
  • Functional Tests
  • User Documentation
  • Developer Documentation
  • Upgrade Scenario
  • Uninstallation Scenario
  • Backward Compatibility
  • Troubleshooting Friendly

Jira Ticket:

NONE

Release note:

NONE

Bump various golang dependencies:
- github.com/evanphx/json-patch/v5 v5.9.0 => v5.9.11
- github.com/machadovilaca/operator-observability v0.0.24 => v0.0.26
- github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 v2.20.2 => v2.23.4
- github.com/onsi/gomega v1.34.2 => v1.37.0
- github.com/machadovilaca/operator-observability v0.0.24 => v0.0.26
- github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 v2.20.2 => v2.23.4
- github.com/onsi/gomega v1.34.2 => v1.37.0
- github.com/openshift/library-go v0.0.0-20240830130947-d9523164b328 => v0.0.0-20250402180609-ce2ba53fb2a4
- github.com/operator-framework/api v0.27.0 => v0.30.0
- github.com/operator-framework/operator-lib v0.15.0 => v0.17.0
- github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoring v0.76.0 => v0.81.0
- github.com/prometheus/client_golang v1.20.2 => v1.22.0
- github.com/prometheus/common v0.57.0 => v0.63.0
- github.com/samber/lo v1.47.0 => v1.49.1
- github.com/spf13/pflag v1.0.5 => v1.0.6
- golang.org/x/mod v0.20.0 => v0.24.0
- golang.org/x/sync v0.12.0 => v0.13.0
- golang.org/x/tools v0.24.0 => v0.32.0
- gomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v2 v2.4.0 => v2.4.0
- k8s.io/* v0.31.0 => v0.32.3
- k8s.io/kube-openapi v0.0.0-20240827152857-f7e401e7b4c2 => v0.0.0-20250318190949-c8a335a9a2ff
- sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime v0.19.3
- sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools v0.16.2

Signed-off-by: Simone Tiraboschi <[email protected]>
References to minTLSVersion configuration
got fixed in Openshift APIs with
openshift/api#1679
and we are now consuming it.
All the changes are in textual descriptions
that are now consistent with the actual APIs.

Signed-off-by: Simone Tiraboschi <[email protected]>
TLS 1.3 ciphers were disables in the past on
openshift due to golang limitations.
They got finally enabled with:
openshift/library-go#1850
and we consumed it bumping dependencies.

Align our tests expectations with it.

Signed-off-by: Simone Tiraboschi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simone Tiraboschi <[email protected]>
do not merge, test only!

Signed-off-by: Simone Tiraboschi <[email protected]>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL labels Apr 11, 2025
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot requested review from nunnatsa and orenc1 April 11, 2025 14:17
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign machadovilaca for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2025

@tiraboschi: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/images 799c549 link true /test images
ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure 799c549 link true /test hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure 799c549 link false /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure 799c549 link true /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure 799c549 link false /test hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure 799c549 link true /test hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure 799c549 link true /test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure 799c549 link false /test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure 799c549 link true /test hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws 799c549 link true /test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws 799c549 link false /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Apr 11, 2025

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Apr 11, 2025

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Apr 11, 2025

hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 12, 2025
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants