feat(MeasureTheory): add Resolvent (Stieltjes/Cauchy) Transform #37245
Open
DavidLedvinka wants to merge 15 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Open
feat(MeasureTheory): add Resolvent (Stieltjes/Cauchy) Transform #37245DavidLedvinka wants to merge 15 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
DavidLedvinka wants to merge 15 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
added 12 commits
January 11, 2026 18:23
This reverts commit 00f4eb5.
PR summary 772c92fec9Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
This PR/issue depends on:
|
added 2 commits
March 26, 2026 22:07
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the definition of the
resolventTransformof a measure and some API. This is a non-standard notion that generalizes both the Stieltjes Transform and Cauchy Transform of a (real-valued) measure so that (for example) the proof that these transforms define holomorphic functions off the support of the measure can be given for both at once. Perhaps these important special cases could be made into abbrevs?