-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Early Draft][Splicing] Interactive tx negotiation, with a single ChannelContext. #3630
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
d77be4e
to
31b5574
Compare
Status: it is mostly implemented, in a rough form, but it's not fully functional, due to some fields needing to be moved to
These fields can be seen in
Note that some of the most important fields have been already moved to
|
81cfce5
to
7dba1df
Compare
7dba1df
to
1994c40
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3630 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.24% 89.14% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 155 155
Lines 119280 119542 +262
Branches 119280 119542 +262
==========================================
+ Hits 106446 106569 +123
- Misses 10240 10373 +133
- Partials 2594 2600 +6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Completed, transaction negotiation is going through for the splicing transaction (@jkczyz). |
1994c40
to
1f415d4
Compare
…splice_ack messages, but fail afterwards
…ific extra input (on top of lightningdevkit#3443) lightningdevkit#3516
049d853
to
1c3b4da
Compare
Progress: Extended implementation to handle last |
1c3b4da
to
b9ace39
Compare
b9ace39
to
110492d
Compare
This is a continuation of #3444, without duplication of
ChannelContext
, only `FundingScope' is duplicated during splice negotiation.Includes: