Skip to content

Conversation

@STaRDoGG
Copy link
Contributor

linuxserver.io


  • I have read the contributing guideline and understand that I have made the correct modifications

Description

Well, I see there are a couple here in the PR's already but not passing the requirements, and seemingly ignored by the authors, and I'm using the app myself, so ... shrug

Benefits of this PR and context

doesn't already exist in the repo

How Has This Been Tested?

My own local machine.

Source / References

https://discount-bandit.cybrarist.com/

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link

This pull request is locked due to inactivity

@linuxserver linuxserver locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 21, 2025
@Roxedus Roxedus reopened this May 23, 2025
@linuxserver linuxserver unlocked this conversation May 23, 2025
@Roxedus Roxedus merged commit d6106c5 into linuxserver:master May 23, 2025
8 checks passed
@petarvnikolov petarvnikolov mentioned this pull request May 31, 2025
1 task
@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link

This pull request is locked due to inactivity

@linuxserver linuxserver locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 23, 2025
@STaRDoGG STaRDoGG deleted the patch-6 branch September 3, 2025 07:41
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants