Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#691] Multiple services configured #696

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

SilviaAmAm
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #691

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.40%. Comparing base (5cb2731) to head (f47b1dc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #696      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.32%   90.40%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         211      213       +2     
  Lines        6286     6297      +11     
  Branches      675      675              
==========================================
+ Hits         5678     5693      +15     
+ Misses        608      604       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 91.10% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
jest 32.71% <ø> (ø)
storybook 86.40% <ø> (+0.17%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please move this to manager/queryeset (combined)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed: Service is an external model so using utils is fine.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed: Service is an external model so using utils is fine.

@SilviaAmAm SilviaAmAm merged commit ee4a1f9 into main Feb 20, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prevent crash if multiple services of the same type are configured
3 participants