Skip to content

feat(policy-engine): add OrcaRouter as a named llm annotator provider - #3802

Open
JinhaoSong322 wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
JinhaoSong322:add-orcarouter-provider
Open

feat(policy-engine): add OrcaRouter as a named llm annotator provider#3802
JinhaoSong322 wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
JinhaoSong322:add-orcarouter-provider

Conversation

@JinhaoSong322

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem & Solution

The bundled llm annotator dispatcher in the policy engine ships named provider presets for OpenAI, OpenAI-compatible, Azure OpenAI, Bedrock, Gemini, and Ollama. This PR adds OrcaRouter as another first-class named preset (provider: orcarouter), so a manifest can route its LLM judge through the OrcaRouter gateway the same way it would through any other named provider.

OrcaRouter is an OpenAI-compatible model gateway that aggregates open-weight and frontier models behind one endpoint. It also runs gateway-level, zero-trust security for AI agents on the same endpoint — screening every prompt/response and governing every tool call on a default-deny basis, with no application code changes.

Impact on Your Work

Running LLM annotators through OrcaRouter gives deployments a single base URL for many model families plus gateway-level guardrails on judge traffic, configured purely from the ACS manifest (provider, model, api_key_env) with no host code changes.

Timeline

None.

Alternatives Considered

The repo already models a generic openai_compatible preset that would accept any endpoint, but a named orcarouter preset matches the existing first-class provider pattern (same treatment as OpenAI, Bedrock, Gemini, etc.) and keeps the schema self-documenting, exactly like the other named presets.

Type of Change

  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)

Package(s) Affected

Governance & security:

  • policy-engine

Testing

Unit Testing

Added 5 unit tests in policy-engine/core/src/dispatchers/llm.rs:

  • orcarouter_default_uses_gateway_endpoint_key_and_model — default URL (https://api.orcarouter.ai/v1/chat/completions), default key env (ORCAROUTER_API_KEY), default model (orcarouter/auto), JSON response format.
  • orcarouter_supports_explicit_endpoint_and_key — explicit endpoint + model + api_key_env are honored.
  • orcarouter_base_url_appends_chat_completions — a gateway-root base_url gets /chat/completions appended.
  • orcarouter_base_url_with_full_path_is_kept — a full-path base_url is used unchanged.
  • url_sourced_orcarouter_does_not_read_default_env_key — a URL-sourced manifest never reads the host ORCAROUTER_API_KEY (fail-closed parity with the OpenAI regression test).

Full run: cargo test --workspace passes. The single pre-existing failure (host::tests::from_path_zero_config_evaluates_rego_manifest) requires the external opa CLI and fails identically on clean main; it is unrelated to this change.

cargo fmt --check, cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings, and python scripts/docs/check_links.py are clean.

Manual Testing

Live end-to-end against the real OrcaRouter gateway using the new provider path (ORCAROUTER_API_KEY from the environment, LlmAnnotator::dispatch):

  • provider: orcarouter with default endpoint/model → {"label":"allow","raw":"{\"label\": \"allow\"}"}
  • base_url: https://api.orcarouter.ai/v1{"label":"deny",...} (200)
  • endpoint: https://api.orcarouter.ai/v1/chat/completions{"label":"deny",...} (200)

Checklist

  • I have linked a related issue above, or completed "Problem & Solution", "Impact on Your Work", and "Alternatives Considered"
  • My code follows the project style guidelines (ruff check)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
  • All new and existing tests pass (pytest)
  • I have updated documentation as needed
  • I have signed the Microsoft CLA

Attribution & Prior Art

  • This contribution does not contain code copied or derived from other projects without attribution
  • Any external projects that inspired this design are credited in code comments or documentation
  • If this PR implements functionality similar to an existing open-source project, I have listed it below

Prior art / related projects (if any):
The named-provider pattern mirrors the existing openai/openai_compatible/bedrock/gemini/ollama presets already in this dispatcher.

AI Assistance

  • I can explain every meaningful change in this PR: what it does, why, and what tradeoffs were considered
  • I have run tests and verification appropriate for this change
  • No part of this PR was autonomously submitted by an AI agent without my review
  • I have not used AI to generate review comments on others' PRs

IP, Patents, and Licensing

  • This contribution does not implement patent-pending or patent-encumbered techniques
  • This contribution does not require an NDA or licensing agreement to understand or use
  • Any AI tools used have terms compatible with the MIT License

Disclosure: I'm an engineer on the OrcaRouter team.

Add the OrcaRouter gateway as a first-class `orcarouter` provider preset
alongside OpenAI, OpenAI-compatible, Azure OpenAI, Bedrock, Gemini, and
Ollama in the bundled `llm` annotator dispatcher.

The preset points at https://api.orcarouter.ai/v1/chat/completions by
default, reads ORCAROUTER_API_KEY, and defaults to the orcarouter/auto
gateway model. An explicit `endpoint` or `base_url` overrides the
default; a gateway-root `base_url` has /chat/completions appended.
Responses use the OpenAI chat-completions shape, so the existing content
extraction path applies unchanged. URL-sourced manifests keep the
existing fail-closed behavior and never read the host ORCAROUTER_API_KEY.

Registration points updated: Rust dispatcher enum + dispatch, constants,
the manifest JSON schema (core + spec), the llm-annotator-providers docs,
and the ACS specification section 10. Unit tests cover the default
endpoint/key/model, explicit endpoint, base_url appending, base_url with
full path, and the URL-sourced credential restriction.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: JinhaoSong322 <jinhao.song@myflashcloud.com>
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Welcome to the Agent Governance Toolkit! Thanks for your first pull request.
Please ensure tests pass, code follows style (ruff check), and you have signed the CLA.
See our Contributing Guide.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/M Medium PR (< 200 lines) labels Aug 21, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Review Summary

Check Status Details
🔍 Code Review ⚠️ Missing No current-run comment
🛡️ Security Scan ⚠️ Missing No current-run comment
🔄 Breaking Changes ⚠️ Missing No current-run comment
📝 Docs Sync ⚠️ Missing No current-run comment
🧪 Test Coverage ⚠️ Missing No current-run comment

Verdict: ⚠️ AI review incomplete; ready for human review

AI review comments are untrusted advisory output. The summary reports workflow-generated completion status only, not model-authored pass/fail claims.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Contributor Check: HIGH

Check Result
Profile HIGH
Credential LOW
Overall HIGH

Automated check by AGT Contributor Check.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk label Aug 21, 2026
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown

JinhaoSong322 please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]

Options:

  • (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
  • (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
Contributor License Agreement

Contribution License Agreement

This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your
contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature
date below.

  1. Definitions.
    “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
    that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
    “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
    approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
    “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
    Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
    systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
    discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
    otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
    “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
    associated comments and documentation.
  2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
    Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
    described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
  3. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
    Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
    to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
    received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
    containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
    restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
    guidelines concerning Submissions.
  4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
    for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
    Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
    property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
    employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
    Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
    desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
    and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
  5. Licenses.
  • Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
    Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
    the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
    parties.
  • Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
    Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
    Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
    import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
  • Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
    No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
    granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.
  1. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
    licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
    have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
    make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
    employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
    law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
    have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
    You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
    REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
    EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
    PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
    NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  2. Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
    You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
    respect.
  3. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
    contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
    information that You submit with Your Submission.
  4. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
    the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
    Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
    exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
    defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
  5. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
    supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
    the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk size/M Medium PR (< 200 lines)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant