-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 286
Analyzer implementation to enhance assertions #6720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AtolagbeMuiz
wants to merge
6
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
AtolagbeMuiz:analyzer_implementation_to_enhance_assertions
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1ea58a1
analyzer changes
AtolagbeMuiz 1ea6cac
modified the analyzer to accept allow predicate with count greather t…
AtolagbeMuiz 2570d48
modified analyzer
AtolagbeMuiz fc96809
added more analyzer tests..
AtolagbeMuiz d79d506
modified output.cs in the integration tests; to reflect analyzer changes
AtolagbeMuiz ff88554
added analyzer support for predicate suggestions applied to Assert.Is…
AtolagbeMuiz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding SingleAny and SingleCount for the
.Single()
Linq extension method.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this just to add it as part of the enums because, there is no use of it for now in the codebase except if we have an issue that wants the analyzer to check for predicate that uses Single Linq
@Youssef1313 thoughts on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant full support of
.Single()
in this analyzer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ohh okay.. please can you provide sample code of how it can be used and the expected suggestion code we want analyzer to give..
just to make sure we are on the same page. thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can see a few cases, but I'm not sure if they make sense. In all those cases the thrown exception would change at least in one of the possible failure cases. (And those old assertions are not good to start with.)
That's also why I didn't include those when I initially wrote the issue.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the pull request is now updated with the requested changes.. analyzer has been updated for Single and SingleOrDefault @stan-sz @cremor