feat(bridge-react): add support for custom createRoot on createBridgeComponent

[radualex]

Description

Extended the definition of createBridgeComponent method to support an optional custom createRoot property that can overwrite the default createRoot method. This can be used in the client app to load a custom React DOM for example:

import React from 'react';
import ReactDOMClient from 'react-dom/client';
import { createBridgeComponent } from '@module-federation/bridge-react';

const App: React.FunctionComponent = () => {
    return (
        <div />
    );
};

export default createBridgeComponent({
    rootComponent: App,
    createRoot: (container, options) => {
        return ReactDOMClient.createRoot(container, options);
    }
});

Related Issue

Fixes #3537

Types of changes

• Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.
• I have updated the documentation.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 7479ba4

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 29 packages

Name	Type
@module-federation/bridge-react	Major
@module-federation/runtime	Major
@module-federation/enhanced	Major
@module-federation/rspack	Major
@module-federation/webpack-bundler-runtime	Major
@module-federation/sdk	Major
@module-federation/runtime-tools	Major
@module-federation/managers	Major
@module-federation/manifest	Major
@module-federation/dts-plugin	Major
@module-federation/third-party-dts-extractor	Major
@module-federation/devtools	Major
@module-federation/bridge-vue3	Major
@module-federation/bridge-shared	Major
@module-federation/bridge-react-webpack-plugin	Major
@module-federation/modern-js	Major
@module-federation/retry-plugin	Major
@module-federation/data-prefetch	Major
@module-federation/rsbuild-plugin	Major
@module-federation/error-codes	Major
@module-federation/inject-external-runtime-core-plugin	Major
@module-federation/nextjs-mf	Patch
@module-federation/node	Patch
@module-federation/storybook-addon	Major
@module-federation/modernjsapp	Patch
@module-federation/esbuild	Patch
@module-federation/runtime-core	Patch
@module-federation/utilities	Patch
website-new	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for module-federation-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	7479ba4
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/module-federation-docs/deploys/67d6ba919892e400085e7a90
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-3544--module-federation-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[danpeen]

@radualex Thank you for your PR!

[danpeen]

@radualex I think we have provided the custom render config to let users be able to customize their own render logic. Does this configuration meet your scene?

[danpeen]

@radualex But also, I think supporting custom createRoot also makes sense. I will support this. (Because I don't know why this CI pipeline keeps failing, I have submitted another pr to support this feature)

[radualex]

@radualex But also, I think supporting custom createRoot also makes sense. I will support this. (Because I don't know why this CI pipeline keeps failing, I have submitted another pr to support this feature)

@danpeen Alright. Can you reference this PR then, so we can close this?

[Bulletninja]

I think I identified the CI failure in this PR. Seems the issue is caused by an .only modifier in packages/bridge/bridge-react/__tests__/bridge.spec.tsx which Vitest rejects in CI environments.
Fix PR: radualex#1

Verification steps:
Tests fail with --no-allowOnly flag when .only is present
Tests pass when the modifier is removed

This should resolve the CI error blocking this PR.

[danpeen]

Hello @radualex, Sorry for the late response. It is in this pr I support the custom createRoot: #3551