refactor: Bump version to 2.0.0 and update Node engine requirements #247
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe root Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #247 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 4 4
=========================================
Hits 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
package.json (1)
3-3: Major version bump to 2.0.0 requires CHANGELOG and migration documentation—All Might's verdict stands!As flagged in previous reviews, a major version bump signals breaking changes to your users. However, this PR still lacks:
- ✗ CHANGELOG entry documenting what broke and why
- ✗ Migration guide explaining how users should update their workflows
- ✗ Updated README clarifying the Node engine support policy
The Node engine constraint changes ARE intentional and correct (LTS-only strategy: Node 20, 22, 24), but users need clear communication about this breaking change before they encounter it in production!
This Plus Ultra release deserves proper documentation!
Please create:
- A CHANGELOG.md entry for v2.0.0 highlighting breaking changes (Node 14/16/19/21/23 no longer supported, now LTS-only)
- A migration guide (e.g.,
docs/MIGRATION-2.0.0.md) with upgrade steps for users on unsupported Node versions- Update README.md to document the LTS-only Node support strategy
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: ci
package.json
[error] 1-1: npm ci failed due to JSON parse error in package.json: Expected ':' after property name in JSON at position 1644. Note: package.json must be valid JSON.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: docker
| { | ||
| "name": "parse-hipaa-dashboard", | ||
| "version": "1.5.2", | ||
| "version": "2.0.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Major version bump to 2.0.0 requires clear CHANGELOG and migration documentation.
While the version update is syntactically correct, a major version bump signals breaking changes to your users. However, the PR provides no documentation explaining what has changed or why.
Young hero! To ensure your users understand this massive leap in versioning, you must deliver:
- CHANGELOG.md entry documenting the 2.0.0 release and all breaking changes
- Migration guide (MIGRATION.md or docs/2.0.0-migration.md) with concrete upgrade steps
- Updated README or release notes explaining the Node.js engine tightening
Since no dependencies have changed (parse-dashboard remains 8.0.0), clarify what constitutes the breaking change in 2.0.0. Is it purely the Node.js version requirement shift? If so, your documentation must make this crystal clear to consumers!
Young Hero! It's Time to Plus Ultra Your Documentation Verification!
I sense the need to gather critical information from your repository before declaring this a winning move! Let me search the codebase with the power of a true hero!
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for changelog and migration documentation
fd -i 'changelog|migration|release|news' --type f
# Show full package.json content
echo "=== FULL PACKAGE.JSON CONTENT ==="
cat package.json
# Check for any version-related commits or documentation
echo "=== CHECKING FOR DOCS DIRECTORY ==="
find . -type d -name 'docs' -o -type d -name 'doc' 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 1725
Need to check the README for any documentation of this breaking change!
---
🏁 Script executed:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check README for migration/breaking change documentation
echo "=== README.md CONTENT ==="
cat README.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No README.md found"
Length of output: 5668
BECOME A HERO OF DOCUMENTATION — PLUS ULTRA!
Young developer! Your code may be strong, but your release is INCOMPLETE without proper documentation! I've verified the repository with the power of a true hero, and the results demand action:
CRITICAL FINDINGS:
- ✗ No CHANGELOG.md exists (searched entire repository)
- ✗ No migration guide exists
- ✗ README.md has ZERO breaking change documentation
You claim 2.0.0 is a MAJOR release, yet you've abandoned your users without guidance! The breaking change is clear: Node.js support has been tightened to LTS versions only (20, 22, 24), dropping Node 18 and below. This WILL break deployments silently unless users know!
BEFORE THIS RELEASE GOES LIVE, ADD:
- CHANGELOG.md — Document 2.0.0 release with the Node.js engine breaking change
- MIGRATION.md or update README.md with explicit upgrade steps and Node.js version requirements
- Make crystal clear why this is a major version bump
A true hero never leaves citizens in confusion! Your users are counting on you to guide them through this transition!
PLUS ULTRA — DELIVER THIS DOCUMENTATION!
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around line 3, the reviewer flagged missing release
documentation for the 2.0.0 major bump and a breaking change (Node.js support
tightened to LTS 20/22/24); add a top-level CHANGELOG.md documenting the 2.0.0
release with a clear “Breaking Changes” section that states Node 18 and below
are no longer supported and why, create MIGRATION.md (or update README.md with a
Migration section) that lists exact upgrade steps (check Node version, update
engine constraints, test steps, and roll-back guidance) and include rationale
for the major version bump so users understand the impact and required actions.
| "engines": { | ||
| "node": ">=14.20.1" | ||
| "node": ">=20.18.0 <21.0.0 || >=22.12.0 <23.0.0 || >=24.0.0 <25.0.0" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
Node engine constraint: LTS-only strategy is PLUS ULTRA, but documentation is essential!
Excellent work! The engines constraint now:
- ✅ Supports only LTS versions (Node 20, 22, 24) for stability
- ✅ Excludes short-lived odd-numbered releases (19, 21, 23)
- ✅ Removes EOL'd Node 18 (
<21.0.0instead of<19.0.0) - ✅ Includes Node 24 LTS (entered Active LTS Oct 28, 2025)
- ✅ Proper JSON syntax with "node" property key
However, this restrictive constraint (compared to the previous >=14.20.1) is a breaking change for users on unsupported Node versions.
Add a note to your CHANGELOG explaining:
- Why you're adopting an LTS-only policy
- The specific Node versions now supported and their EOL dates
- How users on unsupported versions should proceed
Consider adding this policy to your README under "Requirements" so future maintainers understand the versioning strategy and can update constraints proactively as Node releases evolve!
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around lines 55-57, the Node engines change is a breaking,
LTS-only constraint; add a CHANGELOG entry explaining the new LTS-only policy,
list the exact supported Node versions (20, 22, 24) with their EOL dates, and
include clear upgrade guidance for users on unsupported versions (commands for
nvm or Docker images, and fallback options). Also add/augment the README
"Requirements" section to document the LTS policy and update process for
maintainers, and reference the CHANGELOG entry; ensure wording is concise and
include a note to update these docs when Node LTS changes.
No description provided.