Batch 07

Author: MrHinsh

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -862,12 +862,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Mastery": {
     "category": "Technical Mastery",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:30",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content provides specific technical implementation details for customizing UI components in .NET, which aligns with best practices in software craftsmanship and engineering practices related to software design.",
-    "level": "Secondary"
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:21",
+    "ai_confidence": 42.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 30.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 38.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content provides a practical example of customising UI elements in Windows Forms using .NET, which touches on software craftsmanship and design principles. However, it lacks a broader discussion on best practices, principles of clean code, or methodologies that contribute to high-quality software development. The focus is primarily on implementation rather than a comprehensive exploration of technical mastery.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Working Agreements": {
     "category": "Working Agreements",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net/index.md

@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ aliasesArchive:
 tags:
 - Windows
 - Software Development
-- Technical Mastery
 categories: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -166,12 +166,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Excellence": {
     "category": "Technical Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:16:59",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the implementation of a UI adapter within the Composite UI Application Block, focusing on engineering practices related to code quality and extensibility. It provides detailed code examples and discusses design choices that enhance the maintainability and adaptability of the application, aligning well with the principles of technical excellence.",
-    "level": "Secondary"
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:18",
+    "ai_confidence": 62.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15,
+    "ai_alignment": 30,
+    "ai_depth": 25,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 56.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on implementing a technical solution within the Composite UI Application Block (CAB), specifically regarding the ToolStripPanel UI Adapter. It discusses the technical details of code implementation, including inheritance and factory patterns, which align with the principles of modular architecture and emergent design. However, while it provides a good level of detail on the implementation, it lacks broader discussions on methodologies like TDD or CI/CD practices, which are central to the category of Technical Excellence. Therefore, while it is relevant, it does not fully encompass the category's scope.",
+    "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Flow Efficiency": {
     "category": "Flow Efficiency",
@@ -961,12 +964,15 @@
   },
   "Engineering Excellence": {
     "category": "Engineering Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:32",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:15",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 25.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses technical implementation details about enhancing the ToolStripPanel UI Adapter within the Composite UI Application Block (CAB), which reflects principles of software craftsmanship and development practices. It focuses on the technical aspects of code adaptation, inheritance, and improved functionality, aligning well with engineering excellence principles.",
-    "level": "Secondary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on implementing a specific feature in a software framework, detailing code and technical solutions. While it touches on aspects of software craftsmanship, such as extending functionality and code reuse, it lacks a broader discussion on engineering excellence principles, best practices, or continuous improvement processes. The depth of discussion is limited to a specific implementation without addressing overarching themes of quality assurance or team collaboration.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Coaching": {
     "category": "Coaching",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/index.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ResourceImportId: 467
 ResourceImportSource: Wordpress
 ResourceImportOriginalSource: GeeksWithBlogs
 date: 2006-06-22
-weight: 640
+weight: 855
 creator: Martin Hinshelwood
 layout: blog
 resourceTypes: blog
@@ -30,10 +30,8 @@ tags:
 - Practical Techniques and Tooling
 - Pragmatic Thinking
 - Software Development
-- Technical Excellence
 - Technical Mastery
-categories:
-- Engineering Excellence
+categories: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 
 ---

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -166,12 +166,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Excellence": {
     "category": "Technical Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:11:25",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:12",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of WCF and its features, which relates to technical practices in software development, but it is primarily focused on the author's personal evaluation rather than a broader discussion on engineering methodologies.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and its features, which relates to technical excellence in terms of software development practices. However, it lacks explicit discussions on methodologies like TDD, CI/CD, or modular architecture. The focus is more on the technology itself rather than the engineering practices that enhance agility and quality in software development. While there is some depth in discussing WCF's benefits, it does not sufficiently align with the core themes of technical excellence.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Flow Efficiency": {
     "category": "Flow Efficiency",
@@ -961,12 +964,15 @@
   },
   "Engineering Excellence": {
     "category": "Engineering Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:28",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:09",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of WCF (Windows Communication Framework) and its attributes related to software development practices, suggesting a recommendation for using it in future web service projects. While it touches on software craftsmanship, it's more focused on an evaluation of a specific technology rather than broader engineering principles.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and its features, which touches on aspects of software craftsmanship and development practices. However, it lacks a direct focus on engineering excellence principles, such as coding standards, testing methodologies, or continuous improvement processes. The discussion is primarily about the technology itself rather than the broader context of engineering excellence, resulting in a low confidence score.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Coaching": {
     "category": "Coaching",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/index.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ResourceImportId: 464
 ResourceImportSource: Wordpress
 ResourceImportOriginalSource: GeeksWithBlogs
 date: 2006-08-09
-weight: 775
+weight: 855
 creator: Martin Hinshelwood
 layout: blog
 resourceTypes: blog
@@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 tags:
 - Software Development
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
-categories:
-- Engineering Excellence
+categories: []
 
 ---
 I am currently evaluating WCF for my company. Now, ML has some pretty strong polocies on beta software, but they seam to be missing something with WinFX. I can find information on the company intranet on Vista and Office 2007, I can even request them to be installed on my desktop as part of an internal beta program, but nothing on WinFX or WCF!

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-11-net-framework-3-0/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -142,12 +142,15 @@
   },
   "Code and Complexity": {
     "category": "Code and Complexity",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:23:02",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:05",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 20,
-    "final_score": 47.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses improvements in code quality and functionality due to the use of WCF in .NET Framework 3.0, indicating a secondary theme related to code quality and complexity.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 31.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions improvements in code quality and developer productivity due to the use of .NET Framework 3.0 and WCF, but it lacks a detailed discussion on the complexities of software development or the principles of code quality. The focus is more on the excitement of using a new framework rather than exploring the interplay between code and complexity.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Evidence Based Management": {
     "category": "Evidence Based Management",
@@ -1060,12 +1063,15 @@
   },
   "Engineering Excellence": {
     "category": "Engineering Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:30",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses improvements in developer productivity and coding practices through the use of the .NET Framework 3.0 and WCF, which are relevant to software craftsmanship, but the primary focus is on the framework itself rather than broader engineering excellence themes.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:03",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions improvements in developer productivity and code cleanliness due to the use of .NET Framework 3.0 and WCF, which aligns with the principles of software craftsmanship. However, it lacks a detailed discussion on best practices, continuous improvement, or specific engineering processes, resulting in a low confidence score.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Agile Leadership": {
     "category": "Agile Leadership",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-11-net-framework-3-0/index.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ResourceImportId: 462
 ResourceImportSource: Wordpress
 ResourceImportOriginalSource: GeeksWithBlogs
 date: 2006-11-11
-weight: 775
+weight: 855
 creator: Martin Hinshelwood
 layout: blog
 resourceTypes: blog
@@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 tags:
 - Technical Mastery
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
-categories:
-- Engineering Excellence
+categories: []
 
 ---
 At last .NET Framework 3.0 is live! I have been desperate to use it in work ever since I got a book on Indigo as I can see so many applications for it that would increase developer productivity and consistency.

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-18-windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -385,11 +385,14 @@
   },
   "Windows": {
     "category": "Windows",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:46:52",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:59",
+    "ai_confidence": 78.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 90.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 70.0,
+    "ai_depth": 80.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 50,
-    "final_score": 77.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content focuses on getting the Windows Mobile Device Center running on Windows Vista, discussing installation and related issues, which aligns with the primary topic of the Windows operating system.",
+    "final_score": 75.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content explicitly discusses the Windows Mobile Device Center in relation to Windows Vista, which is a direct mention of the Windows operating system. It aligns well with the category's focus on installation and troubleshooting, particularly regarding the beta version of the software and the issues encountered during updates. The depth of discussion is substantial as it provides specific instructions and context about the installation process and the challenges faced, indicating a strong focus on the Windows environment.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Azure Repos": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-20-installing-visual-studio-2005-on-windows-vista/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -466,11 +466,14 @@
   },
   "System Configuration": {
     "category": "System Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:46:51",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content involves installation and potential configuration issues related to Visual Studio 2005, which are relevant to system configuration but does not explore broader configuration methodologies or best practices.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:56",
+    "ai_confidence": 55.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 30.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 40.0,
+    "ai_depth": 50.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 50.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the installation of Visual Studio 2005 on Windows Vista, which is a specific aspect of system configuration. However, it lacks detailed exploration of best practices, troubleshooting, or optimisation strategies. The mention of errors during installation indicates some engagement with configuration issues, but the overall depth and breadth of the discussion are limited, resulting in a moderate confidence score.",
     "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Acceptance Test Driven Development": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-22-rddotnet-project-created/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -715,12 +715,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Mastery": {
     "category": "Technical Mastery",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:27",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:53",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 5,
+    "ai_alignment": 15,
+    "ai_depth": 10,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses the creation of a new project with technical features and services related to software architecture and extensibility. However, it lacks a deep exploration of the best practices or methodologies in software craftsmanship.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the creation of a new project and its features, which is more focused on project development rather than the principles of software craftsmanship or engineering excellence. While there are mentions of services and extensibility, the discussion lacks depth in best practices, clean code principles, or methodologies that contribute to high-quality software development.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Asynchronous Development": {
     "category": "Asynchronous Development",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-14-windows-cardspace-gets-firefox-support/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -385,11 +385,14 @@
   },
   "Windows": {
     "category": "Windows",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:25",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:51",
+    "ai_confidence": 55.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 60.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 50.0,
+    "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 50,
-    "final_score": 50.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses a specific feature related to the Windows operating system, but it is focused on the integration with Firefox rather than Windows itself.",
+    "final_score": 54.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content explicitly mentions 'Windows CardSpace', which is a feature of the Windows operating system, indicating a direct mention of the category. However, the discussion primarily focuses on the support for Firefox rather than on Windows itself, which affects the depth of discussion. While it aligns with the Windows category by discussing a Windows feature, it lacks comprehensive details on installation, configuration, or troubleshooting, leading to a moderate confidence score.",
     "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Azure Repos": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-ahhh-the-fun-of-deploying-team-system-in-a-large-corporation/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -106,12 +106,15 @@
   },
   "Azure DevOps": {
     "category": "Azure DevOps",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:08:37",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:44",
+    "ai_confidence": 42.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 60.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 30.0,
+    "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses deploying Team Foundation Server (TFS), which is part of Azure DevOps, but the focus is more on personal experiences and challenges rather than on Azure DevOps functionalities or best practices.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 38.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses deploying Team Foundation Server (TFS), which is part of the Azure DevOps suite. However, it lacks a comprehensive exploration of Azure DevOps functionalities and best practices. While TFS is mentioned, the focus is more on personal experiences and specific deployment challenges rather than a detailed discussion of Azure DevOps as a whole. The content does not sufficiently cover the broader themes of CI/CD, agile project management, or integration with other tools, leading to a moderate confidence score.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {
     "category": "Sociotechnical Systems",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-visual-studio-sp1-and-team-system-sp1-are-released/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -214,12 +214,15 @@
   },
   "News and Reviews": {
     "category": "News and Reviews",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:07:30",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:41",
+    "ai_confidence": 62.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 12.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 73.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the release of Visual Studio SP1 and Team System SP1, which falls under industry news related to technology updates.",
-    "level": "Secondary"
+    "final_score": 57.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the release of Visual Studio SP1 and Team System SP1, which aligns with industry news. However, it lacks in-depth analysis or reviews of the updates, focusing instead on personal anticipation and links to external resources. The mention of bug fixes and the download link provides some relevance, but the overall discussion is not sufficiently detailed to fully meet the criteria for the category.",
+    "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Practical Techniques and Tooling": {
     "category": "Practical Techniques and Tooling",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-visual-studio-sp1-and-team-system-sp1-are-released/index.md

@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 tags:
 - News and Reviews
+- Release Management
+- Software Development
 
 ---
 I have been waiting for this for a while and [Brian Harry](http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/) has some comments and notes on the topic. I will be installing this as soon as its mammoth 450mb download completes.

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-windows-live-writer/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -385,11 +385,14 @@
   },
   "Windows": {
     "category": "Windows",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:24",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:22:47",
+    "ai_confidence": 45.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 60.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 30.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 50,
-    "final_score": 50.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses a tool named Windows Live Writer, which is related to the Windows ecosystem. However, it primarily focuses on the tool rather than broader aspects of the Windows operating system, making it a secondary theme.",
+    "final_score": 46.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content mentions 'Windows Live Writer', which is a tool associated with the Windows operating system, indicating a direct mention. However, the discussion primarily focuses on the tool's functionality rather than broader aspects of the Windows OS, such as installation, configuration, or troubleshooting. The alignment with core themes is limited, and the depth of discussion is minimal, focusing only on a specific application without exploring the Windows environment in detail.",
     "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Azure Repos": {