Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

instrumentation: rename experimental semconv status to development in README #3333

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 6, 2025

Conversation

xrmx
Copy link
Contributor

@xrmx xrmx commented Mar 5, 2025

Description

Rename the semconv status from experimental to development in README to match the current semantic conventions naming.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A

Does This PR Require a Core Repo Change?

  • Yes. - Link to PR:
  • No.

Checklist:

See contributing.md for styleguide, changelog guidelines, and more.

  • Followed the style guidelines of this project
  • Changelogs have been updated
  • Unit tests have been added
  • Documentation has been updated

@xrmx xrmx added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Mar 5, 2025
@xrmx xrmx requested a review from a team as a code owner March 5, 2025 11:37
@lzchen
Copy link
Contributor

lzchen commented Mar 5, 2025

Nit: Should we change the term here too?

Copy link
Member

@emdneto emdneto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you know if it also applies to signals? here should we change Logs to development instead?

https://opentelemetry.io/status/ Here they are using Development

@xrmx
Copy link
Contributor Author

xrmx commented Mar 6, 2025

Nit: Should we change the term here too?

Updated

@xrmx xrmx enabled auto-merge (squash) March 6, 2025 10:49
@xrmx xrmx disabled auto-merge March 6, 2025 10:49
@xrmx xrmx enabled auto-merge (squash) March 6, 2025 10:49
@xrmx xrmx disabled auto-merge March 6, 2025 10:49
@xrmx xrmx enabled auto-merge (squash) March 6, 2025 10:50
@xrmx xrmx merged commit 2d5a21a into main Mar 6, 2025
1421 checks passed
@xrmx xrmx deleted the xrmx-patch-3 branch March 6, 2025 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants