Skip to content

feat: use authz permissions on xblock handler when enabled#38179

Open
wgu-taylor-payne wants to merge 1 commit intoopenedx:masterfrom
WGU-Open-edX:tpayne/xblock-authoring-authz
Open

feat: use authz permissions on xblock handler when enabled#38179
wgu-taylor-payne wants to merge 1 commit intoopenedx:masterfrom
WGU-Open-edX:tpayne/xblock-authoring-authz

Conversation

@wgu-taylor-payne
Copy link
Contributor

@wgu-taylor-payne wgu-taylor-payne commented Mar 17, 2026

Description

Use openedx-authz permissions for the /xblock/ endpoint, when the AUTHZ_COURSE_AUTHORING_FLAG is enabled for the given course. The mapping between actions in the CMS and the associated permission is found in this document.

If the AUTHZ_COURSE_AUTHORING_FLAG is disabled then the legacy permission checks will occur.

Supporting information

Closes #37925.

Testing instructions

Run pytest on the new test module cms/djangoapps/contentstore/tests/test_xblock_handler_permissions.py.

To test manually, make sure that the AUTHZ_COURSE_AUTHORING_FLAG is enabled for the course you are testing, and that openedx-platform is using openedx-authz >= 0.22.0. Run manage.py cms load_policies to ensure latest casbin policies have been loaded and then assign course related roles to the users you are testing. Go though the actions outlined in the document linked above and verify that the correct permissions are checked and applied for the given user.

Deadline

Verawood.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U core contributor PR author is a Core Contributor (who may or may not have write access to this repo). labels Mar 17, 2026
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

openedx-webhooks commented Mar 17, 2026

Thanks for the pull request, @wgu-taylor-payne!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-openedx-platform.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in Contributions Mar 17, 2026
@wgu-taylor-payne wgu-taylor-payne marked this pull request as draft March 17, 2026 00:07
@wgu-taylor-payne wgu-taylor-payne force-pushed the tpayne/xblock-authoring-authz branch 3 times, most recently from 2f9370a to eb5b8b6 Compare March 17, 2026 18:27
Co-authored-by: Kiro <noreply@kiro.dev>
@wgu-taylor-payne wgu-taylor-payne force-pushed the tpayne/xblock-authoring-authz branch from eb5b8b6 to cfa5592 Compare March 17, 2026 19:44
@wgu-taylor-payne wgu-taylor-payne marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2026 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core contributor PR author is a Core Contributor (who may or may not have write access to this repo). open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Needs Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Task - RBAC AuthZ - Implement new permission checks on xblock endpoint

2 participants