Skip to content

8317678: Fix up hashCode() for ZipFile.Source.Key #1729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

satyenme
Copy link

@satyenme satyenme commented May 1, 2025

Backporting JDK-8317678: Fix up hashCode() for ZipFile.Source.Key. Fixes java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source hashCode() impl so that duplicate Source objects aren't created for the same zip file. Adds test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test. Patch is clean.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8317678 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8317678: Fix up hashCode() for ZipFile.Source.Key (Bug - P3 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1729/head:pull/1729
$ git checkout pull/1729

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1729
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1729/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1729

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1729

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1729.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 1, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 8d9a4b43f4fff30fd217dab2c224e641cb913c18 8317678: Fix up hashCode() for ZipFile.Source.Key May 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 1, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 1, 2025

⚠️ @satyenme This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 1, 2025

Webrevs

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

satyenme commented May 1, 2025

/approval request for backport. Fixes java.util.zip.ZipFile$Source hashCode() impl so that duplicate Source objects aren't created for the same zip file.

Risk: Low. Tip change was merged in January 2023 and adds a test to confirm correct functionality.

Testing:

  • GHA Sanity Checks
  • Tier 1 and 2 tests locally
  • New test/jdk/java/util/zip/ZipFile/ZipSourceCache.java test

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 1, 2025

@satyenme
8317678: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label May 1, 2025
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented May 5, 2025

Hi @satyenme, can you please give a detailed reason why you think this should be fixed in 21?

Also, please do a dependent PR for the follow-up test fix JDK-8322078

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

satyenme commented May 5, 2025

Since this is just a performance improvement, not high priority, closing

@satyenme satyenme closed this May 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval backport clean rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants