Observations on npm's behavior #11
Conversation
| - One scope must only ever point to one registry. | ||
| - One registry can host multiple scopes. | ||
| - Observations from [email protected]: | ||
| - `npm install` installs dependencies listed in the current `package.json`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am guessing this is a WIP? Sorry if this is too early of a comment, but I think we should avoid documenting too many specific behaviors. The goal would likely be to call out specifically any unexpected behaviors around the name field specifically but not much else. Does that make sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good feedback. yes, a little early, and my additions in this PR definitely need organizing and elaboration.
I think the behavior shows that the description of the name field in npm is (understandably) assuming you are only thinking of package.json describing a package being added to or installed from a registry. At runtime, when package.json is in a module in your node_modules folder, the name field is essentially unused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
… except when it's got an exports field and is self-referencing - then it's quite used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ljharb True! I don’t understand how widespread self-import is. (I didn’t even know it was a special case instead of just node_modules resolution until a day ago or so!) Do you know if there are any stats?
I personally have been using relative URL imports inside a package so as not to repeat the package name everywhere and so I can run my code in a browser without transpilation/bundling.
3 participants
No description provided.