Skip to content

Conversation

drewmiranda-gl
Copy link
Contributor

@drewmiranda-gl drewmiranda-gl commented Sep 24, 2024

This page documents that "In the case of a dedicated search node where the node exclusively has the search role, this value defaults to a fixed percentage of available storage."

However, the document does not provide specifics about what this fixed percentage is. From what I can surmise reading the code [1] [2], and from doing real world testing, this value is set to 80% of the available space on the volume where the file cache lives.

Description

Clarify specifically what fixed percentage is used. See above.

Issues Resolved

Version

All.

Frontend features

Checklist

  • By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and subject to the Developers Certificate of Origin.
    For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

This page documents that "In the case of a dedicated search node where the node exclusively has the search role, this value defaults to a fixed percentage of available storage."

However, the document does not provide specifics about what this fixed percentage is. From what I can surmise reading the code, and from doing real world testing, this value is set to 80% of the available space on the volume where the file cache lives.

Signed-off-by: Drew Miranda <[email protected]>
Copy link

Thank you for submitting your PR. The PR states are In progress (or Draft) -> Tech review -> Doc review -> Editorial review -> Merged.

Before you submit your PR for doc review, make sure the content is technically accurate. If you need help finding a tech reviewer, tag a maintainer.

When you're ready for doc review, tag the assignee of this PR. The doc reviewer may push edits to the PR directly or leave comments and editorial suggestions for you to address (let us know in a comment if you have a preference). The doc reviewer will arrange for an editorial review.

@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS added backport 2.17 Backport for version 2.17 Doc review PR: Doc review in progress labels Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verified and approved.

@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS merged commit 85a9fce into opensearch-project:main Sep 24, 2024
9 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
This page documents that "In the case of a dedicated search node where the node exclusively has the search role, this value defaults to a fixed percentage of available storage."

However, the document does not provide specifics about what this fixed percentage is. From what I can surmise reading the code, and from doing real world testing, this value is set to 80% of the available space on the volume where the file cache lives.

Signed-off-by: Drew Miranda <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 85a9fce)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
leanneeliatra pushed a commit to leanneeliatra/opensearch-documentation-website-forl that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
…arch-project#8363)

This page documents that "In the case of a dedicated search node where the node exclusively has the search role, this value defaults to a fixed percentage of available storage."

However, the document does not provide specifics about what this fixed percentage is. From what I can surmise reading the code, and from doing real world testing, this value is set to 80% of the available space on the volume where the file cache lives.

Signed-off-by: Drew Miranda <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport 2.17 Backport for version 2.17 Doc review PR: Doc review in progress

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants