Skip to content

Conversation

@serverless-qe
Copy link

Update OWNERS file

Copy link

@gauron99 gauron99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauron99, serverless-qe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

14 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7eb36a1 and 2 for PR HEAD e1cb2f0 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 31, 2025

@serverless-qe: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/420-e2e-oncluster-test e1cb2f0 link true /test 420-e2e-oncluster-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from e1cb2f0 to 8639bd6 Compare August 1, 2025 07:01
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Aug 1, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 1, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 1, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-v1.17@1743dbe). Learn more about missing BASE report.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-v1.17    #1339   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   63.10%           
================================================
  Files                    ?      151           
  Lines                    ?    12924           
  Branches                 ?        0           
================================================
  Hits                     ?     8156           
  Misses                   ?     3804           
  Partials                 ?      964           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-test 34.93% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node 24.52% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python 24.40% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus 24.59% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust 24.13% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot 24.16% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript 24.59% <ø> (?)
integration-tests 49.88% <ø> (?)
unit-tests 45.32% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from 8639bd6 to 4bd85ae Compare August 7, 2025 12:49
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from 4bd85ae to 2623f4b Compare August 19, 2025 16:02
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from 2623f4b to 4bd7ec6 Compare October 8, 2025 14:52
@Kaustubh-pande Kaustubh-pande force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from 4bd7ec6 to ba20fe2 Compare October 13, 2025 05:26
- dsimansk
- gauron99
- Kaustubh-pande
- Kaustubh-pande

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is one name entry twice 🤔

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch 4 times, most recently from bbcfe2d to e66ce27 Compare October 19, 2025 14:12
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from e66ce27 to 169e25a Compare October 21, 2025 21:15
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch 2 times, most recently from aba0237 to b9bade4 Compare November 4, 2025 08:32
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from b9bade4 to 3b700a1 Compare November 7, 2025 17:41
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.17 branch from 3b700a1 to 75dca13 Compare November 10, 2025 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants