Skip to content

Conversation

@DCChadwick
Copy link

@DCChadwick DCChadwick commented Nov 20, 2025

Version(s): 4.21

Issue: OSDOCS-17249

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 20, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 20, 2025

@DCChadwick: This pull request references OSDOCS-17249 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.21

Issue: OSDOCS-17249

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 20, 2025

@DCChadwick: This pull request references OSDOCS-17249 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.21

Issue: OSDOCS-17249

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 20, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Thu Nov 20 21:48:21 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://102883--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@DCChadwick: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/validate-portal 9bd7c2d link true /test validate-portal
ci/prow/validate-asciidoc 9bd7c2d link true /test validate-asciidoc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@DCChadwick
Copy link
Author

Some big things have changed while I was on PTO. Regarding this PR, the assembly has been removed from the directory and the whole chapter has been reorganized. Updating this PR would be time consuming, so I just created a new PR on a branch that is based off the latest changes to main. Long story short: the new PR is here - #103772

@DCChadwick DCChadwick closed this Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants