RHDEVDOCS-7038: Content creation for Pipelines 1.20.2 RN #103792
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-7038 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/S
Dhruv-Soni11
force-pushed
the
RHDEVDOCS-7038
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fc8120b to
78493f1
Compare
openshift-ci
bot
added
size/M
Dhruv-Soni11
force-pushed
the
RHDEVDOCS-7038
branch
from
78493f1 to
d3edb82
Compare
|
/retest |
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
| * The `maxRetention` parameter in {tekton-results} retention agent is deprecated. Use `defaultRetention`. | ||
| * The `maxRetention` parameter in {tekton-results} retention agent is deprecated. Use `defaultRetention` instead. | ||
| + | ||
| [NOTE] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can this be categorized as a known issue
anithapriyanatarajan
left a comment
anithapriyanatarajan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add the detail that in 1.20.0 if defaultRetention is not set mexRetention value would be lost - as a Known Issue
3 participants
Version(s):
None for CP
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-7038
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
SME review:
QE review:
Peer review:
Additional information: